Skip to main content


It is funny how people can read in and blame you for being snarky even though there was none intended. The willingness to read in things "between the lines" is strong in humans.

Humans are more difficult than code.

in reply to Florian Haas

@xahteiwi you joke but in the actual case I was also told:

"This is the most unfriendly forum of all that I monitor."

... so yeah, I clearly need to up my game...

in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

Content warning: Unsolicited advice; disregard if not inclined

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Florian Haas

you are right in that I of course can always improve and I am in no way claiming that I'm a master of expressing myself.

but it is also a question of how much time and effort I can spend on a single person in a single thread...

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

Exactly, also consider that you are running a project with an exceptional upstream-to-downstream ratio. curl has well upward of a million users per contributor.
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

@xahteiwi But what is an improvement. Without knowing the other person, their perception and backgrounds, it's almost impossible to get it right. Even being polite can be received as hostile, as example if you are asking for more details.
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

yeah it's really hard to convey tone in text. That's why I like emojis
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

I find myself overusing the smiley faces like ":)" in text communication, to try to communicate that my voice is meant to be non-hostile
in reply to iliazeus

@iliazeus yes

also, not excluding elementary politeness, such as thanking people for doing their part well, can go surprisingly far -- "thank you for the bug report", "i appreciate the effort you put into the response", etc.

once the ego demon gets its sacrifice, almost nobody dares to be a dick

in reply to NetworkManager

that is a good advice indeed. I believe I often am a little too direct and brief, and that might be considered... impolite.
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

"Humans are more difficult than code."

... and every single person on the spectrum in the world nodded in unison.

in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

I heavily doubt humans are more difficult than C++ code. At least both share the notion of undefined behavior.

#cplusplus #humans

in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

oh yes the the `bugzilla effect' -- everyone looks unpleasant in a bug tracker
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

Text communication being bereft of other communication elements doesn't help either.

One more reason to use social media less and try to have in-person interactions more.

No disrespect.

in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

I have adhd and autism, and my ability to both infer and convey tone is TERRIBLE. Text based conversations are usually much easier for me to deal with, as it allows me to slow down, and actually process things.

It's probably a stupid reason, but I have been wrong regarding interactions a lot. It's bitten me in the ass more times that I can count, especially at work.

in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

I don't know if it's a "willingness" so much as an instinct. Our brains developed this way, to tell stories, find meaning, and fill in the blanks. When we are communicating we may feel like we've left no blanks to fill, but even in person it's impossible.
in reply to katy lavallee

@katylava yeah, I meant that our brains "want" to find meaning and a tone, and depending on multiple things we sometimes find such even if there maybe was none intended