Good news and bad news. #Conversations_im 2.17.0 has support for emoji reactions π Since @Codeberg appears to be under constant DDoS attacks they have added pretty strict rate limits that the @fdroidorg build server keeps running into. π Another build cycle just failed and it's unclear when 2.17.0 will be available on F-Droid. Maybe Codeberg and F-Droid can back channel an allow list or something? π
Sorry for the inconvenience! We did mention here that we haven't changed any of our rate limits in response to the recent outages yet, so we find this kind of weird: social.anoxinon.de/@Codeberg/1β¦
(Regardless: @fdroidorg, feel free to get in touch with us so that we can work things out!) ~n
@grote@chaos.social
This is interesting feedback. There have been no changes to the rate-limiting, and the last two changes over the past three months were always increases.
We have blocked several offending IP ranges.
You're fine! I didn't mean to come across as defensive either, I just wanted to provide some more context (that this wasn't an abnormally overzealous ratelimit - which seemed to be your assumption and would've been my assumption too). ~n
kevin
in reply to Daniel Gultsch • • •Hippo π
in reply to Daniel Gultsch • • •Codeberg.org
in reply to Daniel Gultsch • • •Sorry for the inconvenience! We did mention here that we haven't changed any of our rate limits in response to the recent outages yet, so we find this kind of weird: social.anoxinon.de/@Codeberg/1β¦
(Regardless: @fdroidorg, feel free to get in touch with us so that we can work things out!) ~n
Codeberg.org (@Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de)
social.anoxinon.de - MastodonDaniel Gultsch
in reply to Codeberg.org • • •Sorry this wasnβt meant to be an accusation. Iβve been a very happy member for almost two years and will continue to be.
Build log says HTTP Response code 429. Thatβs literally all I know.
But if it's not intentional thatβs even more reason for you and @fdroidorg to get in touch.
Codeberg.org
in reply to Daniel Gultsch • • •You're fine! I didn't mean to come across as defensive either, I just wanted to provide some more context (that this wasn't an abnormally overzealous ratelimit - which seemed to be your assumption and would've been my assumption too). ~n
P.S. Nope, definitely not intentional :)
Julini
in reply to Daniel Gultsch • • •methuselah
in reply to Daniel Gultsch • • •Benjamin
in reply to Daniel Gultsch • • •Chewie
in reply to Daniel Gultsch • • •I can confirm that reactions works with the #OpenFire XMPP server π₯³