Skip to main content


We'd like to hear your feedback!

Brave people asked us to include Brave as a Google Chrome alternative. In the original post, Brave was not included because it is based on Chromium.

What are your thoughts: Should we, or should we not include Brave in this image of Google alternatives? Why?

mastodon.social/@Tutanota/1133…


It's #CyberSecurityMonth! Time to #deGoogle 💪💪💪

What are your favorite privacy-first apps?

Check out our list:
tuta.com/blog/how-to-leave-goo…


in reply to Tuta

based on Blink, so reinforces Google's monopoly on web engines, and uses crypto and ad services... I wouldn't.
in reply to Tuta

Not only are they Chromium based and thus IMO shouldn't be included if vanilla Chromium is in the list, but they also have their weird crypto stuff and the CEO has A LOT of problematic views.

So that's a solid NO.

in reply to Tuta

It’s run by a homophobe. You decide.

ft.com/content/461bf398-47ee-1…

in reply to Tuta

I'm not really fond of including it due to the founders homophobic past.

The argument of not including it because it's Chromium falls short in my opinion as DuckDuckGo and Privacy Browser are included, which on Android use System WebView (likely Chrome WebView). WebView is a lot less secure then a Chromium based browser.

I believe Firefox based browsers are also less secure on Android due to not having Per-Site Process Isolation.

in reply to Tuta

include @threemaapp as a video/chat alternative, too 👍🏼
This entry was edited (12 hours ago)
in reply to Tuta

#Chromium itself is not the problem. Look at #firefox. If you do nothing it collects your data. Use #librewolf which I miss here, and the story is different.
I also miss #mullvadbrowser and #firefox_focus. #invidious in the meantime is unfortunately almost useless. I miss #standardnotes #Threema, #magicearth, #KeepassDX, #strongbox.
in reply to Tuta

Brave is a valid option because it is one of the few (or only) open source chromium browsers that has a built in ad/content-blocker, uses proper anti-fingerprinting protections, has extra privacy features, and benefits from the chromium security. I underastand the concerns regarding the crypto crap, but those can be turned off. That being said it is a valid option, especially for newbies.
This entry was edited (12 hours ago)
in reply to Tuta

Here's some changes It'd suggest:
- Add @organicmaps to the gmaps alternatives. it's by far the easiest osm based maps app
- Add @ente auth for google auth alternatives. it's much more feature rich and it's foss
- add @kagihq to the search engines. They're privacy respecting * one small note is that they do utilize google as one of it's search indexes that it uses, so you'd still be giving google some money technically (had to mention it)
in reply to Tuta

Why are you recommending Authy, a very shitty service, but not Organic Maps and Obtainium for .apk updates?

For browsers there is Mulch and Mull from DivestOS, which are forks of Chromium and Firefox respectively or Brave. Either of which would be much better than Fennec, Privacy Browser, or Firefox from a privacy or security perspective.

in reply to Tuta

This software list is just an advertising campaign for Tuta.
in reply to Tuta

Personally I’d add it but mention (Chromium based) for transparency
in reply to Tuta

If its google alternatives, you shouldn't include Brave or Chromium. Hopefully we can add Ladybird to that list in a few years. 🤞

Maybe add Freetube as an alternative Youtube client ?

in reply to Tuta

Because most web developers don't seem to build websites with Firefox users in mind, there are a good number of websites that function poorly in Firefox.

So, for the users seeking an alternative that don't want to use Firefox, I'd say include an open source Chromium-based browser. There are none that are convenient, except Brave and Chromium itself. But Chromium would be defeating the purpose.

Unfortunately, the majority of people care more about convenience than anything else.

This entry was edited (10 hours ago)
in reply to Tuta

As far as the rest of this list is concerned. It's needed an update for a while now.

Play Store:
Aurora Store + Obtainium

Docs:
NextCloud + LibreOffice

GDrive:
NextCloud + pCloud + Filen Sync + Icedrive + Proton

Instant Messenger:
Matrix - FluffyChat, Element, Element X

Map:
Organic Maps

Password:
KeepassDX + OneKeePass

Authenticator:
KeePass clients can be used as authenticators.

YouTube:
FreeTube + Odysee (toxic though)
AND remove Vimeo

Web search:
Brave search + Startpage

This entry was edited (10 hours ago)
in reply to Tuta

What are your thoughts on mullvad browser? Any reason why you left it out?
in reply to Tuta

@adam_wysokinski /e/OS is an extraordinarily insecure operating system massively rolling back security even more than LineageOS already does. It completely destroys the security model and is always at least a year behind on providing full privacy/security patches. CalyxOS is problematic for security, LineageOS is far more problematic but /e/OS is an extreme form of that comparable to you recommending people use Windows 8 because it's not from Google.
in reply to Tuta

In your recommendations image #Fennec appears, and right now it is not a good recommendation, F-Droid recommends uninstalling it.
in reply to Tuta

Some recommendations:
- Add ente auth from @ente instead of Authy.
- Add proton pass from @protonprivacy to the password manager section.
- Add mullvad browser from @mullvadnet to the browser section.
- Also add @brave too since even if it is based on chromium it is still better than using chrome.
- Add divestos.org/ to the alternative os section.
This entry was edited (8 hours ago)
in reply to Tuta

What’s wrong with Chromium? Browsers based on it use a robust sandbox and enhanced security measures. According to @GrapheneOS recommendations, we should "avoid Gecko-based browsers like Firefox as they're currently much more vulnerable to exploitation and inherently add a huge amount of attack surface".
grapheneos.org/usage#web-brows…
This entry was edited (6 hours ago)
in reply to Tuta

Brave is in bed with crypto nonsense, so it should not be suggested.
By the way, Vivaldi should totally be suggested.
in reply to Tuta

Your current list includes 5 web browsers where 3 of them completely lack even a content sandbox due to being based on Firefox for Android and the other 2 are based on Chromium. DuckDuckGo and Privacy Browser are WebView-based browsers using the system WebView implementation, which is provided by the OS with a Chromium-based browser engine. On Android operating systems including the Google apps and services, DuckDuckGo and Privacy Browser are directly using Google Chrome itself.
in reply to Tuta

Are these recommendations really the best idea?

Don't get me wrong, your intentions are probably good, but inherently as a privacy project - and direct competitive to some alternative services which you will not be able to list while being great choices - you will not be an objective source for these recommendations. A lot of these services are either outdated, or there are much better alternatives for them, many of which are completely missing.

This entry was edited (3 hours ago)