Skip to main content

in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

seems very reasonable to me. I think people would be surprised if libcurl started handling a new protocol like that and I can think of a lot of abuse cases that could suddenly appear.
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

Your argument is quite solid and sane, IMHO.

Even though I've not come to do any curl development (yet?), I think it makes perfect sense to let libraries do as little as possible - but do those things really well. And libraries can easily be stacked on top of each other - to provide a more specialised functionality.

To take a bit more childish view of this ... I always prefer to see software libraries as LEGO bricks where you combine them to build your master piece. I don't want a single piece giving me something I've been convinced I wanted (like Playmobil) and then get less flexibility to make it my own master piece.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
Unknown parent

daniel:// stenberg://
@Man2Dev sure we could, but why allow experimental code in if I don't think it belongs there in the first place?