Are you sure? Because it has quite a lot of red flags that hint at it too being "AI" slop, and all the matches for this image online are very dubious and recent.
"Published date: July 2, 2024", and looking at the other images uploaded by the same user also does not exactly inspire confidence pixabay.com/users/uwetr-143255… (no other images are done in the same style, half of images are explicitly labeled as "AI generated").
@jani totally agreed. but I have come to accept that after a few decades, the feature development share has decreased into a rather small piece of the pie...
Jo, decades of ignoring security and now complaining about the interests of the technical dept. I’m so sick and tired of all the complaints about “uhhh, ohhh, security….” from everywhere. If everybody would have done their job from beginning, instead of just hacking shit together (MVP, PoC, move fast and break things bullshit), then we would not have this problem. So stop complaining about security and do your job, or leave it!
Inga stands with 🇺🇦 🇵🇸
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •> an old painting of a ship
Are you sure? Because it has quite a lot of red flags that hint at it too being "AI" slop, and all the matches for this image online are very dubious and recent.
daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Inga stands with 🇺🇦 🇵🇸 • • •Inga stands with 🇺🇦 🇵🇸
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Enno T. Boland
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •kerio
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to kerio • • •kerio
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •I thought it was a timeline at first, I see that they're both shorter in the bad day now 😔
Perhaps there could be a way to make it even more obvious?
daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to kerio • • •Jani Nikula
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Jani Nikula • • •Weltraumschaf ⭐️🇪🇺
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
Unknown parent • • •