daniel:// stenberg://

1 year ago • •

daniel:// stenberg://
1 year ago • •

"The #OpenSSL project really seems to be in a dead end for me, it's incompatible with #QUIC and unfixable performance-wise" / Willy Tarreau

mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/…

Re: QUIC (mostly) on top of OpenSSL without patches

Search IETF mail list archives

^{mailarchive.ietf.org}

in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

rsalz

in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • 1 year ago • •

I'm looking for people to join a fork of OpenSSL to Apache. Please forward for reach. I have a draft proposal I can share.

daniel:// stenberg:// reshared this.

in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

Christian Pietsch (old acct.)

in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • 1 year ago • •

Are you sure this is not just Google propaganda? At any rate, I'd like to read the other side of the story, too.

#audiaturEtAlteraPars

#audiaturetalterapars

in reply to Christian Pietsch (old acct.)

daniel:// stenberg://

in reply to Christian Pietsch (old acct.) • 1 year ago • •

@chpietsch this is a long-going complaint on the OpenSSL project that is certainly not driven by Google

@Christian Pietsch (old acct.)

in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

Ondřej Surý

in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • 1 year ago • •

I’m not particularly vested in OpenSSL, but for us (BIND 9), there are two main problems with the competitors: a) missing PKCS#11 support (we dropped native PKCS#11 support for engine/provider), b) license - we need MPL compatible license that doesn’t affect the compiled binaries.