Skip to main content


Mozilla is an advertising company now.

This seems completely normal and cool and not troublesome in any way.

Mozilla has acquired Anonym, a [blah blah blah] raise the bar for the advertising industry [blah blah blah] while delivering effective...
jwz.org/b/ykVg

in reply to jwz

Preemptive subtwit.

Let's say you run a nonprofit animal shelter. And for some reason, some people feel you should be seeing hockey-stick growth, but the donations aren't covering it.

So you decide to start up a side-line of selling kittens for meat.

Then you will inevitably have someone stroking their chin and saying, 'Yes, yes, but how could they afford to stay open if they weren't selling kitten deli slices?"

Some might say -- maybe you aren't an animal shelter any more. Some might say.

in reply to jwz

Firefox has been my go-to because Google has infected almost all dominant browsers. Suggestions for a browser from a non-ad-incentivized I can use on multiple platforms?
in reply to Dylan 🗑️🏪

@Wavebeam librewolf.net/ is a fork of Firefox with the Mozilla stuff stripped, it might be the best non-Chromium and multiplatform option for now.

I hope that Apple releases Safari for Windows again just so there is one more engine out there (weirdly I saw a Safari ad today).

in reply to Orthia

Floorp went proprietary and is kind of sketchy.

I’d avoid any browser based on Firefox ESR except the Tor Browser on “safer” or “safest” mode. ESR only receives security fix backports if they have a sufficiently high-enough severity.

Edit: rescinded, see replies

This entry was edited (4 months ago)
in reply to Seirdy

It went back to Open Source:

blog.ablaze.one/4125/2024-03-1…
github.com/Floorp-Projects/Flo…

V12 in development will move to the full GNU license and is moving away from the ESR release:

blog.ablaze.one/4364/2024-06-1…

That leaves "kind of sketchy"?

in reply to Orthia

oh nice! i rescind what I said then.

The original reasons outlined for going proprietary felt sketchy because I wasn’t sure how other projects using the source would hurt Floorp the way the maintainer described, unless Floorp would start adding features that generated a revenue stream or something.

But if they backtracked that’s reassuring.

This entry was edited (4 months ago)