chrome developers: we are thinking of dropping support for rendering RSS feeds as something other than garbage code. does anyone have any reasons not to do this?

developers from many different backgrounds: yes, I rely on normal people being able to understand RSS for my business. dropping support will be disastrous for me because I can't rely on people to have some random extension installed.

chrome devs: OK well we're probably going to do it anyway because we can't be bothered to support web standards. uwu google is only a teensy wee company uwu

github.com/whatwg/html/issues/…

#xslt #standards #openWeb

reshared this

in reply to ansuz / ऐरन

And this happens now because the open source library they used for XSLT was made by people that got burned out by multi billion companies using it without giving something back gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2…
This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to ansuz / ऐरन

chrome developers: see, we need to drop support for this feature because the library we use has vulnerabilities

web devs: why does it have vulnerabilities? can't they be fixed?

chrome devs: welllll, there's one person maintaining it for zero compensation even though pretty much all major browser vendors rely on their work and we keep sending new bug reports for them to fix and they basically told us to fuck off after years of exploitation

web devs: excuse me, what?

chrome devs: yea, so unreasonable, right?

reshared this

in reply to ansuz / ऐरन

and XSLT isn't even just for RSS. It can be used as an alternative to server-side includes to assemble (X)HTML documents from fragments

labrador.oblomov.eu/uberprufun…

and to produce SVG plots

wok.oblomov.eu/tecnologia/plot…

and sparklines

wok.oblomov.eu/tecnologia/plot…

wok.oblomov.eu/tecnologia/spar…

from XML data, with potentially massive saves in hosting costs.

It could do even more if browsers hadn't stopped at XSLT1.

Google's control of the web must be uprooted.

This entry was edited (2 weeks ago)
in reply to jonny (good kind)

@jonny sadly it won't matter. Google has a stranglehold on the WHATWG, Mozilla is subservient and guided by people who couldn't care less about its users (see them shoving AI everywhere), and Apple is happy to follow suit as well.

We'd need someone truly independent of GAFAM on the WHATWG that could block the process.

@dillo ? @servo ?