I admit that I feel salty about the word “enshittification” taking off instead of my phrase for the same thing: “user domestication”. I prefer the latter because it emphasizes the gross disrespect so many platforms show their users, and how the lack of autonomy/mobility naturally leads to enshittification.

Any platform able to get away with enshittification will do so when given the incentive. Enshittification emphasizes the process of a platform’s downfall; we should be taking steps to prevent that from happening in the first place by keeping platforms open. Vigilance against enshittification is misplaced when better spent against user domestication.


Originally posted on seirdy.one/notes/2024/01/11/en… (POSSE). #enshittification #UserDomestication

This entry was edited (1 year ago)

Seirdy reshared this.

in reply to Seirdy

@BalooUriza the reality is that user domestication is a much better phrase to describe the trend, considering that these platforms basically consider users to be chattel.

its not your money, its their money, you just happen to be the gatekeeper.

its not your data, its their data, and again you just happen to be the gatekeeper.

when companies think of their userbases like this, its a very unhealthy attitude.

in reply to Howard Chu @ Symas

@hyc @ariadne @BalooUriza Cory also linked "enshittification" to "techno-feudalism", as defined by Varoufakis and others; seen from this perspective, "user domestication" is really "user serfdom" (if I'm correctly translating "servitude de l'utilisateur"). Then again, is there much of a difference between being chattel and being serfs to the platforms?
This entry was edited (1 year ago)