I am disappointed that @matrix didn't publish any response to the Soatok post.
At least to provide some context about
- Why was an insecure crypto implementation knowingly chosen for libolm?
- Why was the fact that libolm is potentially insecure not clearly communicated?
- Why was the crypto implementation not replaced sooner?
- Why is the ecosystem so slow to start using the Rust rewrite?
- Does the foundation plan to do anything about that?
This entry was edited (2 months ago)
The Matrix.org Foundation
in reply to David • • •David
in reply to The Matrix.org Foundation • • •The Matrix.org Foundation
in reply to David • • •