Welp, it's official.

I had to let go of a client today because they are *all-in* on the slop machines…Claude to be precise. They intend for it to be integral to all code going forward.

I told them I can't do it. I won't do it!

Which leaves me in a real bind because the one major client I have left simply isn't able to pay all of the bills. A real strain on my finances…yikes. 😕

Anyhoo…good news is I'm ready to contribute real senior Web Dev expertise to your next project! 😅 #FediHire

in reply to feld

@feld @Moray Whatever your own experience is, it is quite inappropriate to dismiss @jaredwhite choice like that, as if it were not well thought out.
There is an excellent article (in French) I recently read about how wrong the "just a tool" line is. One point is about the conditions making gAI possible (including exploitation of workers and ressources concentration), another is about what it does to the way we organize. The latter point includes the fact that gAI can becomes mandatory, and this thread is a good example; especially your message framing as some kind of laziness objections to using gAI.
in reply to Benoît Régent-Kloeckner

maybe you're just being dense, but what you're proposing has nothing to do with this scenario. He is a 1099 contractor. It is quite illegal for them to dictate how he works or when he works as that would require he become a W2 employee.

They can't force him to use gen AI. They *can* ask him to make sure the codebase has all the useful breadcrumbs so it will work well with Claude or whatever. But then they cannot force him to use Claude to complete any tasks.

They literally cannot force him. He can just complete this ask, and then continue working as he normally would.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)