It's very, very obvious why people hate AI anything when shit like this is what you get back.
Here's a video that came up in my recommendations, very clearly made with #Suno and I wasn't going to call it out publicly until I realised that the creator deleted my comment to someone else asking if AI Was used to write it.
Now I will.

Nowhere in the description does it say this was all made with AI.
Nowhere does it say 'Yeah I just gave Suno a prompt and let it generate some banal shit.'

I have a serious, serious problem with this. It's disingenuous and the comments are full of praise for the music, and absolutely no negative comments.
If mine has been removed (which was just asking the creator to disclaim his content) then how many others have been removed too?

Full disclaimer: *I* use Suno, but I give it my material, get itt to cover it and *always* say when I've done so, no exceptions.
Fucking livid!

youtu.be/5I_e2d3Wxp0?si=NDih8q…

#suno
in reply to Andre Louis

Oh damn! I can still see it, but it could just be YT comment section crap. Or perhaps he's fast and has already deleted it? Either way, my comment said the following. Probably quite close to what you wrote, but figured it didn't hurt to try.

To people congratulating this channel or this music, I believe there is evidence to suggest the music may have been generated with AI. It's a very real possibility these days, and I encourage you all to exercise caution online about what is human-created and what is AI-generated.
If I am wrong, then I wholeheartedly apologise and will immediately retract my comment. Having someone claim your work is simply generated feels terrible after all. If I am correct however, I'd like to stress that it is incredibly disingenuous to suggest that a work has been created by a human instead of being generated by AI. YouTube I believe now has a system in place that makes it easier for creators to mark whether content is synthetic, and if this is the case here I encourage you to use this. Regardless, I just think people should ask themselves more if the content they interact with is created by humans or not.
Anyway, thanks for coming to my TED talk.

in reply to Andre Louis

This is happening in the audiobook space, the commercial audiobook space, and just *sigh* it stinks as a consumer because now I am scared to *buy* anything after 2023 because no disclosures, no nothing! No saying it is, ahem, AI, or anything! I'd often joke that everything AI deserves to be pirated and stolen without anybody giving any money to anybody that uses these things to generate content, like, public content, but I know two wrongs don't make a right but slop is flooding the internet now, to the point where I'm starting to use piracy sites as a catalog of sorts just to find indie authors that don't just pump out AI narrations without even disclosing as such, and then giving thess fake narrators full names and just UGH! Now, though, I'm just tired. I haven't heard anything about it in the music space so assumed it didn't hit that industry yet, but this is also another reason I stick to podcast directories and such. I dunno, it's just sad and frustrating. I'm tired. @FreakyFwoof @Minionslayer @lerven
in reply to Robert Kingett

@Minionslayer
@WeirdWriter @Minionslayer @lerven It's starting to happen with sound effects too. I recently got an update to a sound library, granted this was a free update to something I purchased 10 years ago so I can't complain too much, which added over 3000 new effects. Which was all well and good until I found things like an "elephant trumpet" that sounds like someone badly blowing into a trumpet, or other sounds with that trademark AI fuzz in them. And as for how this is effecting music Ben Jordan's most recent video which is totally worth watching says this year alone there has been a 15% per day increase in song registrations this year, meaning around 50 million new songs were uploaded to streaming services just last year. I don't even want to know how many of them were AI generated. youtube.com/watch?v=QVXfcIb3OK…