Skip to main content


Encryption guarantees privacy. πŸ”’

Check here how private email services compare to #Gmail πŸ‘‡

And read this comparison for all the details: tuta.com/blog/protonmail-vs-gm…

#Gmail #ProtonMail #TutaMail

in reply to Tuta

ok question: do you consider open-sourcing your encryption for other services like protonmail?
in reply to Georgeeeeeee

@mini_george All client code, including the encryption is published as open source.
in reply to Tuta

As a #TutaMail user, and a happy one, I have to say - I personally think the Quantum-safe Encryption claim is B.S.

Researchers are still in the process of attempting to develop and use fully functional Quantum computers and not even close to certain about how they work. How can you make this claim?

Same goes for #simplex , @simplex

in reply to θ³’ι€²γ‚Έγ‚§γƒ³γƒŠ

@kenjen @simplex That's not correct. We use the results from the NIST round of defining pq algorithms. Plus, we encrypt in a hybrid way - also with proven, standard algorithms to make sure that your data stays safe no matter what.
in reply to Tuta

I will remind that Tuta is based in Germany, and Germany is the biggest oposition to these crazy UE ideas of breaking encryption "to prevent child abuse"
in reply to Tuta

Add to you a red cross for ergonomics and functionality.

These points never appear on your comparisons. But Gmail and ProtonMail are way ahead of the game and several people I converted to Tuta no longer use it because of this. And so, in the end, I send almost no encrypted e-mail.

⇧