Age verification is spreading like cancer.

First they came for adults site and social media; now they are already discussing about putting VPNs and app stores behind #AgeVerfication 🇬🇧🇦🇺

What’s sold as “online safety” means #surveillance via IDs checks or face scans.

Privacy & anonymity protect journalists, whistleblowers & activists.

We must fight against age verification - or the free web dies!

👉 More: tuta.com/blog/age-verification…

in reply to Tuta

Hurrah!! Excellent news!! I don’t want young men inducted into pornography and sexual abuse of minors! And I don't want young women inducted into the belief that that kind of abuse is normal! I would like to see high costs for ALL pornography, and the obligation to REGISTER to allow Authorities to verify whether a registered user is guilty of sexual criminal behaviour and abuse!
Maybe YOU like it, and maybe YOU like little children being targeted, but most of us do NOT!
in reply to Tuta

The thing that annoys me most about all of that is this: They already have my ID.

My ISP, as in the Internet Service Provider that Provides me with access to the Internet, already required my ID to sign up.

I only have any access to the internet in the first place because I already gave them my ID.

There is absolutely no need for me to hand out my ID to everyone like candy at a halloween party just for one of them to leak it in a breach because that's five dozen attack vectors.

This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to Tuta

The reality is that to fight disinformation, misingotmation and scams, only ID verification will work IF and it's a big if, cannot be controlled by governments and corporations, plus the "fake accounts" and bot farms are locked out of Internet, especially social media.
And it ain't going to be good if governments take the lead on developing the solutions.
in reply to nocci [cyberpunk'd]

@nocci Thank you very much for your feedback and for sharing your stance on this. We agree that this poem could be misinterpreted in such a way, and that is definitely not something we intended. However, in the English-speaking world it is commonly used today to speak up against increasing surveillance tendencies, and that's what we are doing here. We are sorry if this did not come across clear enough and will review future posts more critically.
in reply to Tuta

There are people who believe this will lead to the destruction of the web we know it and I am sure that would be the case, but the offline world will be affected as well.

Even if you refuse to provide ID and do their verification checks, there will be a time where even the government will require some sort of online presence.

The days we lived our lives entirely offline are gone.

I hope I am wrong!