This profile of me in *The New Yorker* came out really well, if I do say so myself:
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/cory-doctorow-wants-you-to-know-what-computers-can-and-cant-do
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/cory-doctorow-wants-you-to-know-what-computers-can-and-cant-do
Cory Doctorow Wants You to Know What Computers Can and Can’t Do
Christopher Byrd interviews the post-cyberpunk writer Cory Doctorow, about the monopolists of Big Tech, the weirdness of crypto, and the lessons of science fiction.Christopher Byrd (The New Yorker)
Doc Edward Morbius ⭕
in reply to Cory Doctorow • • •I think Doctorow's touching on a universal truth: that any rules-based system ultimately ends up being a sort of barristered hell. It's why content moderation is so damned context-sensitive. And also why and how extremists on both sides of a divide can drive out moderates and give rise to a highly-partisan shriekfest. Closely related to SSC's "Toxoplasma of Rage":
https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/12/17/the-toxoplasma-of-rage/
@pluralistic
#CoryDoctorow #NewYorker #ContentModeration #Lawyering #ToxoplasmaOfRage
Cory Doctorow Wants You to Know What Computers Can and Can’t Do
Christopher Byrd (The New Yorker)