Ew, that's gross. Also auto-closing after a certain time is frustrating. I saw one years old issue recently that people are commenting on every month so it doesn't expire.
it's disgusting the amount of orange people saying that it's ok and reasonable in the comments. Orange site keeps surprising even one already knows it's one of the worst holes of the internet.
Should you ever mark issues and pull request as stale and then close them, well maybe, but I don't think this process should be automated as the way it will ...
Improvement Suggestion When an issue is opened in this repo, @daebot will mark it as won't fix and close the issue, and will only reopen it if the issue author stars the repo [example]. In my opini...
Y'know, most of the time when I report a bug, it's as a contribution to the project. The fix itself is rarely useful to me because I've either patched it myself or worked around it.
All these started with the 'stale issues' bot. Closing issues automatically based on activity, instead of its merit is a brain-dead concept, IMO. This tendency arises from the social-media-attention-economy where online activity is projected as a status symbol. By promoting the idea that open issues are bad, they're also conditioning people into performing free labor.
@|all stop using platforms with such incentives. i just noticed someone's auto-generated "my year on github" video. đ¤Ļđģââī¸ seems like "too embarrassing" does not exist any more. can we please try to work without all these instant gratification dopamine pumps? #LeaveGithubAlready #leavegithub
Just wait until the devs ask for logs or backtraces.
"âŖī¸ This request is marked as wontsubmit as you have not yet starred my user account. Please kindly consider giving a star to my account. Your support means a lot to me. Thanks for your understanding. After you become a stargazer, please also reply to this message with the keyword understood. Afterward, I will upload the desired log files and backtraces for you. Once again, your support is much appreciated. Cheers."
Reminds me of a repository in Nextcloud I hit recently which limits most of its functionality to contributors only, and you are advised to open and get a PR merged.
Newk
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Timothy Wolodzko
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Skrrp :bisexual_flag:
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Stefan Eissing
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •James Basoo
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •No star, No fix | Hacker News
news.ycombinator.comvascorsd
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •The other m
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Moritz Dietz
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Travis Newton :node:
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •matt godbolt
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Brodie Robertson
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Matthew Booth
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •DieMadColonizer
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •mmu_man
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •ottO
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Thomas Frans đēđĻ
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Man2Dev :idle:
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •youtube.com/watch?v=1lYgB_NHFYâĻ
This Github Bot Is Harmful To Users & Devs
YouTubeClemens
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Ann Effes
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Whooot?
You cannot report issues unless you "starred" the repository?
If it helps I can *stare* at it in disbelief for a few minutes.
Paul Taylor
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •AMS
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •đ David Sommerseth
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •This project in question reverted that. And it may even be in violation with GH ToS.
Details: github.com/daeuniverse/dae/issâĻ
[Enhancement] Stop daebot's abuse behavior åæĸ daebot įčĻæąåˇæčĄä¸ē ¡ Issue #374 ¡ daeuniverse/dae
GitHubtamas
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •:debian: đđđđđ :opensuse:
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Chris [list of emoji]
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •soaproot
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Gokul Das
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •rob salmond (he/him)
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Schoentoon đŗđąđ¨đ
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Edvin Malinovskis
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •thđms
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Billy O'Neal
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Fennix :donor:
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Shane Celis
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Nils Goroll đī¸:varnishcache:
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •i just noticed someone's auto-generated "my year on github" video. đ¤Ļđģââī¸
seems like "too embarrassing" does not exist any more.
can we please try to work without all these instant gratification dopamine pumps?
#LeaveGithubAlready #leavegithub
meispi
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Raven Luni
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Ikani
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •srslypascal
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Just wait until the devs ask for logs or backtraces.
"âŖī¸ This request is marked as wontsubmit as you have not yet starred my user account. Please kindly consider giving a star to my account. Your support means a lot to me. Thanks for your understanding. After you become a stargazer, please also reply to this message with the keyword understood. Afterward, I will upload the desired log files and backtraces for you. Once again, your support is much appreciated. Cheers."
Nadim Kobeissi
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Timo Tijhof
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •"Stars Don't Mean Shit", takes on a new level of meaning.
I recall a blogpost back in the day along these lines by @dmethvin. I can't find it though...
Thomas đđšī¸
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Sofie đŗī¸âđ
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Reminds me of a repository in Nextcloud I hit recently which limits most of its functionality to contributors only, and you are advised to open and get a PR merged.
hachyderm.io/@soupglasses/1115âĻ