Vispero software prices have increased.

JAWS Home Annual
JAWS Home Annual
Regular price$104.50
ZoomText Magnifier/Reader Home Annual
Regular price$93.50

Fusion Home Annual
Regular price$187
JAWS
JAWS Home Perpetual License with SMA
Regular price$1,548
ZoomText
ZoomText Magnifier/Reader Perpetual License with SMA
Regular price$1,232
ZoomText
ZoomText Magnifier Perpetual License with SMA
Regular price$885
OpenBook
OpenBook Perpetual License
Regular price$1,100

store.freedomscientific.com/co…

reshared this

in reply to Joy Tilton

@tinygirl @robini71 @Lino_JR OpenBook was an amazing program for its time. The landscape was very different in the '90s as we didn't have Bookshare, Kindle or Apple Books. If there were some pprint books that you needed or just wanted to read immediately, you either had to scan them, obtain a service to scan them for you or have them recorded by services like Recording for the Blind. At that time, having access to OpenBook or K1000 and a flatbed scanner was a big deal and, depending on your needs, might have been essential, especially if you needed access to print material in an educational setting. Now, things are much different. Obtaining accessible books is much easier. Phones and smart glasses can go a long away for many OCR tasks and so I just can't see paying $1100 for OpenBook.
in reply to David Goldfield

@tinygirl @Lino_JR I always had thoughts of scanning in hard to find books but always found that it took more patience than even I possess and i'm a patient soul. It was also difficult for me to keep track of whether or not a page had already been scanned or was waiting to yet be scanned so eventually I gave up on that idea. But I bless others who still do it and submit to Bookshare and the like.
in reply to adisonverlice

@adisonverlice Everyone is entitled to their opinions but in some corporate environments where specialized scripting is needed Jaws For Windows can still be of benefit and as I said I for one have never gotten this tendency of trashing one in order to bolster another. I'm content to let each coexist quite nicely and let each decide that which works best for themselves in any given moment, situation and environment.
in reply to adisonverlice

@adisonverlice Yes I understand that. But that's the thing I always try to understand things even if they don't directly impact me personally because they may be quite important too others and their given situations and workflows. And because NVDA is more open source in orientation some corporate environs won't even let it run. That's why I say there's still a place for both and even more and one needn't supplant the other.
in reply to Robin Frost

@robini71 @adisonverlice Adison, with respect, JAWS is not, as you say, a scam. If NVDA meets your needs, that's absolutely fine. In truth, NVDA has evolved to be a really great screen reader. If JAWS was an exact clone of NVDA or even worse, I might also be critical of its price tag. However, the fact is that you do get a lot of features and capabilities in JAWS which are not present in NVDA and your question about Hartgen Consultancy only proves that, since JAWS has a framework for scripting that allows programs like Leasey, the Zoom Pro scripts, the Muze and the Station Playlist Studio scripts, along with others, to even exist. To be fair, NVDA does allow third party add-ons and it also has some features that JAWS does not. I've used NVDA prior to its official public release and I've used every version of JAWS since 1.0 and I keep up with the features of both screen readers. JAWS may not be something that you personally need but calling it a scam is just inaccurate and unjustified.
in reply to David Goldfield

I see.
i'm not saying it's a scam as if it were a fact, and my apologies if it came out that way. jaws was good when I first used it, it did what I needed it to do back then. but back then I thought it was the only screen reader I needed.
that is, untill I got out and noticed more options.
so these days jaws just, feels, like a scam to me. and i'm not saying that as fact, that is opinion based on my part. I know many people in my friend group who use it and I respect that.
but for me, it just feels like a scam.
the reason is the price tag.
I would maybe revert this opinion if the SMAs didn't exist. I like to, oen, my screen reader.
own, as in, it's either pay once, or pay nothing, and own it. FS just does not meet that requirement.
again, if FS deleted the SMAs my criticalness of them would not be so bad, and I might consider using them again. but untill then, it feels like a complete sham to me and (for now) i've lost all hope for it...
in reply to David Goldfield

@robini71 @adisonverlice Back when JAWS was HenterJoyce, if something didn't work in a work setting, they would send out a scripter to see if there was something that they might be able to tackle. This is easily done when you're small. Nowadays, you get what you get; unless you have connections. Case in point, the broken cut and paste in Chromium browsers and speech history. I haven't heard anything from FS, although a few Beta testers say that FS is aware. That's fine, but be more apparent about it. Just say, we know it's an issue and we'll fix it. That's what I like about NV access. They'll tell you something is broken and when to expect a fix. FS? Crickits!
in reply to Nick's world 🌎 👨‍🦯

@gocu54 @jstark @robini71 @mcourcel I think people were confused because you suddenly put an example of something that's not even a screen reader in a topic about screen readers, I for one use JAWS as my daily driver because Leasy is probably the best set of scripts out there, so the extra like $10 for the license doesn't bother me for the year. I have NVDA, but I use it maybe 5% of the time comparatively to how much I use JAWS, and the thing is, its only getting better and more refined. Bryan is awesome and I honestly have found way more utility in JAWS that NVDA just can't compare or compete with.
This entry was edited (1 week ago)
in reply to David Goldfield

@robini71 @adisonverlice Every so often, I try and give NVDA a go, but I always end up going back to Jaws mainly because it has a more robust laptop keyboard command layout structure for navigation. As much as I try, I just find NVDA’s lack of navigational keys with just the alphanumeric part of the keyboard too limiting. Also, I am in Outlook more or less all day for my business and find jaws support way more developed than MDA as of right now. That’s even with the outlook at on for NVDA. This is with the classic version of Outlook. I don’t think NVDA is somehow a lesser product or anything either.I know a lot of developers and folks with way more technological background and knowledge then I Use it as their main screen reader. Just different strokes for different folks…
in reply to David Goldfield

o kand I get that. I have alternatives to jaws though, so i'm not paying for jaws just to read some picks...in all respect to FS, I think I would use more of their software if the pricing again didn't feel (this my opinion) like a total sham. it's the pricing. for example, SMAs, with those, it feels like jaws is a total sham. I respect you if you use jaws, I was a former jaws user myself.
but i've navigated away from jaws and i'm happy with it. so that is what I will stick to.
now if FS removes those pointless perpetual SMA agreements, I will be happy to go back to jaws. I will be happy to explore it.
but untill then, NVDA is my daily driver
in reply to David Goldfield

@robini71 @adisonverlice I would like to also add that calling it a scam is also emplying that all of us who are using JAWS are being scammed, that is further from the truth. There have been times where JAWS has gotten me out of situations that no other screen reader could get me out of. I use both NVDA and JAWS and sometimes narrator at times, but JAWS was what I grew up on. From JAWS 3.7 to 2025, I have used it. I may not agree withh it's prices, but I sertainly do not feel scammed, and seeing as I did identity theft reports for a year for the FTC, well...