Skip to main content


Content warning: DgarLore - Origins (or Hear Dgar say Dgar!)

This entry was edited (3 months ago)
in reply to Dgar

Content warning: DgarLore - Origins (or Hear Dgar say Dgar!)

in reply to Andre Louis

Content warning: DgarLore - Origins (or Hear Dgar say Dgar!)

in reply to Mariia Sydoruk

Content warning: DgarLore - Origins (or Hear Dgar say Dgar!)

in reply to Dgar

My question is, is this better than a screen reader?
in reply to Dgar

If you’re actually seriously asking, it’s better than a screen reader in such a way a video might be better than text I suppose. More personality and character and you have more control over what gets said how, and how it sounds. You’re basically narrating your toots like an audiobook. If you enjoy doing it, there’s nothing wrong with it, but those of us who use screen readers are so used to them that we’re happy reading the text as well. We usually set our screen readers up in very specific ways, like specific voice, the speech rate is really fast, substitutions and different levels of punctuation and so on, so we already have a very specific way in which we read posts which might take literal fractions of the time that listening to the audio might. But on the other hand, you reading your posts gives voice and sound to the text and I think that’s cool.
in reply to Talon

@talon
I have zero experience with screen readers. I can use my imagination and what I’m imagining is something akin to what Stephen Hawking’s “voice” sounds like. And I can imagine how awful a wall of emojis would be.
Glad you liked my AudioToot. It was fun to make.
This entry was edited (3 months ago)
in reply to Dgar

This is what the post sounded like to me yesterday. Use different settings for different things, but this is how I usually read Fedi.
in reply to Talon

@talon
Wow.
That was my toot? I didn’t recognise a single word of that! That’s insane. That’s faster than I can read. Respect. It’s certainly more time efficient.
in reply to Dgar

@talon Even though I am also a screenreader user, I couldn't understand that reading of the toot with Eloquence either, it was too fast for me: I use more human-sounding voices with my screen-reader, faster than ordinary human speech, but not as fast as that.
in reply to Clare Page

@talon’s recording does seem extreme, and I would think that there is a huge variation between users. My mind has been opened once again.
in reply to Dgar

Yes, we're all different when it comes to screenreaders: different voices, different settings, different speeds and the rest.
in reply to Clare Page

Yeah I kind of understood Talon's voice, but not completely everything, because I'm super not used to it. Here's an example of what I use.
in reply to Mariia Sydoruk

I partly understood that. Too fast. I can also use espeak quite fast, but with rate boost on? um, no. LOL.
in reply to Mariia Sydoruk

@Caoimhe @frog67 How you can understand eSpeak at that speech rate is an absolute mystery to me. What the hell lol
in reply to Talon

@talon @frog67 I've just been gradually speeding it up. I once heard someone using it with the speech rate set to 80, and now that's my goal lol. Right now it's at 60.
in reply to Mariia Sydoruk

@Caoimhe @talon @frog67 I have it at 50, although I cheat, I use the Spanish voice to read English too. Weird, I know. But as Spanish has an almost phonetic spelling it's not ambiguous in the end.
in reply to Sukil Etxenike

@sukiletxe @Caoimhe @talon @frog67 That's me with Polish. Rate 60 with rate boost on is what I feel most comfortable with, although I adapt my settings to Mac / iOS of course.