Friendica
meneer
meneer

meneer

meneer@mastodon.myfed.space

meneer

meneer@mastodon.myfed.space

#Infosec, #digitalidentity, #fediverse, #opensource, #eidas

#Jolla fan, #sailfishos lover

#Dutch #Nederland
#Meppel

ActivityPub
2024-03-15 11:35:42 2024-03-11 17:30:08 2024-03-11 17:02:19 4664392

meneer
meneer
akkoma - Link to source

meneer

1 year ago • •

meneer

1 year ago • •


No more rocket science, I'm moving to Post-Quantum encryption any day now...
tuta.com/blog/post-quantum-cry…

@Tutanota
#infosec #cryptography


Post Quantum Cryptography: Why We Need Resistant Encryption NOW.

Quantum-resistant or post-quantum cryptography is our best bet against attacks from upcoming quantum computers to increase security and privacy.
Tutanota
#infosec #cryptography @Tuta
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to meneer

Tuta
mastodon - Link to source

Tuta

in reply to meneer • 1 year ago • •
Welcome to the encrypted side! 💪 🔒
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to Tuta

meneer
akkoma - Link to source

meneer

in reply to Tuta • 1 year ago • •
☺️
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to meneer

Jörn Franke
mastodon - Link to source

Jörn Franke

in reply to meneer • 1 year ago • •
I would use a pre-quantum (e.g. EC) and post-quantum (e.g. KYBER) at the same time. The math behind KYBER Is rather new and other algorithms in the NIST competition have been cracked (rather late in the process!) in a couple of hours on classical hardware.
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to Jörn Franke

Tuta
mastodon - Link to source

Tuta

in reply to Jörn Franke • 1 year ago • •
@jornfranke That's exactly what we do; it's a hybrid protocol using both new and 'old', proven algorithms.
@Jörn Franke
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to meneer

Blort™ 🐀Ⓥ🥋☣️
mastodon - Link to source

Blort™ 🐀Ⓥ🥋☣️

in reply to meneer • 1 year ago • •

It kind of boggles my mind how quantum safe encryption is even a thing that can be achieved, especially without the use of quantum computing itself.

Does anyone know a good basic primer for someone who understands standard encryption (just) but isn't any kind of computer scientist / theoretical mathematician etc?
@Tutanota

@Tuta
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to Blort™ 🐀Ⓥ🥋☣️

Tuta
mastodon - Link to source

Tuta

in reply to Blort™ 🐀Ⓥ🥋☣️ • 1 year ago • •
@Blort It's explained in the blog post, but not in-depth.
@Blort™ 🐀Ⓥ🥋☣️
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to Tuta

Blort™ 🐀Ⓥ🥋☣️
mastodon - Link to source

Blort™ 🐀Ⓥ🥋☣️

in reply to Tuta • 1 year ago • •

Not... really.

The blog post says what projects are being used to encrypt, but the only mention of how is one sentence about that they use problems considered "too difficult" for a quantum computer to figure out. There's no mention, not even a sentence, of what kind of problem or why it would be difficult, which is exactly what I'm wondering.

  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
in reply to Blort™ 🐀Ⓥ🥋☣️

Tuta
mastodon - Link to source

Tuta

in reply to Blort™ 🐀Ⓥ🥋☣️ • 1 year ago • •
@Blort Thanks for pointing this out. We'll review and update accordingly!
@Blort™ 🐀Ⓥ🥋☣️
  •  Languages
  •  Search Text
  •  Share via ...
⇧