3 weeks ago • •
#curl source code age (take 2)
How large share of the code was written after a certain date, over time.
Is it possible to see the amount of code in absolute terms and not as a percentage? :)
#weirdRequests
My scripts for this are of course available and open source and you can run them against your project easily.
Just needs perl, git, gnuplot - and patience.
github.com/curl/stats/blob/mas…
Scripts for generating project statistics and for plotting them as graphs. - curl/stats
Gaining advanced insights from Git repository history. - src-d/hercules
"Look, if we drill deep enough we'll get to the 2011 crunch code!"
Some (paired) years seem to have a bigger impact than others on persistence in the code base - interesting plot!
@dve 100% is the entire code base of the time. It has kept growing ever since before 2000.
But that confusion risk is also why I won't keep this version of the graph, I will go with the "take 4" I posted later.
Étienne Parmentier
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Étienne Parmentier • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚊
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to 𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚊 • • •CgX
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Is it possible to see the amount of code in absolute terms and not as a percentage? :)
#weirdRequests
daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to CgX • • •CgX
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to CgX • • •CgX
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Stephen Shankland
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Stephen Shankland • • •Stephen Shankland
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Stephen Shankland • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Stephen Shankland • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •My scripts for this are of course available and open source and you can run them against your project easily.
Just needs perl, git, gnuplot - and patience.
github.com/curl/stats/blob/mas…
github.com/curl/stats/blob/mas…
stats/codeage.pl at master · curl/stats
GitHubQuentin Pradet
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •kurtseifried (he/him)
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to kurtseifried (he/him) • • •bkim
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •bkim
in reply to bkim • • •GitHub - src-d/hercules: Gaining advanced insights from Git repository history.
GitHubdaniel:// stenberg://
in reply to bkim • • •Christian Rickert
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Christian Rickert • • •Christian Rickert
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •"I have the concept of a design for my code." 🤣
Christian Rickert
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •"Look, if we drill deep enough we'll get to the 2011 crunch code!"
Some (paired) years seem to have a bigger impact than others on persistence in the code base - interesting plot!
Daniel Nordhoff-Vergien
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Daniel Nordhoff-Vergien • • •@dve 100% is the entire code base of the time. It has kept growing ever since before 2000.
But that confusion risk is also why I won't keep this version of the graph, I will go with the "take 4" I posted later.