Skip to main content


#AndroidAppRain at apt.izzysoft.de/fdroid today with 12 updated and 1 added apps:

* AlternativeUnlockXposed: unlock with an alternative PIN (and action)

No removed apps today, but 2 apps switched from a debug key to a proper release key and need uninstall/re-install if you use them:

* Gcam Services Provider (Basic)
* Gcam Services Provider (Photos)

Enjoy your #free #Android #apps with the #IzzySoftRepo :awesome:

in reply to IzzyOnDroid ✅

might have to unsubscribe from your repo seeing the update for "lolisnatcher", hopefully you just didn't know what it was and remove it quickly. Do you stand by having "lolisnatcher" in your repo?

apt.izzysoft.de/fdroid/index/a…

This entry was edited (9 months ago)
in reply to tree

@tree The name might definitely not be the best one, I agree. But is your argument just going by the name, or did you check the app itself and found it offending? It's a Booru client, supporting a list of image boards. I'm not at all home in that area, so I stand corrected if I missed something.

github.com/NO-ob/LoliSnatcher_…

"A booru client with support for batch downloading"

The app is in my repo since 6/2021 and this is the first time I hear a complaint about it.

@tree
in reply to IzzyOnDroid ✅

I can't check it besides the description bc I'm not downloading "lolisnatcher", I think it's completely out of line for the devs to be naming it that regardless of what it is, it might be a useful app for normal image board stuff, but clearly the devs named it that for a reason, I assume one can access loli images, whether they are nsfw images, I'm not personally gonna verify. Like what name would be out of line if this isn't? It's concerning to see this app scrolling the repo.
This entry was edited (9 months ago)
in reply to tree

@tree I have never used it myself. As pointed out, it was added back in 2021 (as I usually do NOT add imageboard or Manga clients by myself, it must have been requested one way or the other).

Scrolling the list of supported boards, I can only go by their names (and by screenshots) as I'm not active in Manga at all. An implication of the name I read only from your concerns, it didn't occur to me before. I can of course add NSFW (b/c "Hentai"?) so it's hidden from your list.

@tree
in reply to tree

@tree PS: I've raised the question directly and openly with the author of the app, looking forward to their explanations. I agree with you that the name alone can feel offending (given you have the background to know that; to me it was not at all obvious when the app was added or it would not have been there). That the app is also on PlayStore can be *an indicator* of its "innocence" as well, though admittedly not proof.
@tree
in reply to IzzyOnDroid ✅

Yeah I don't know, I appreciate you reaching out to the author I would be interesting in hearing their explanation too, I don't know if you can access nsfw content with the app, I would assume so since it's an imageboard viewer and there must be nsfw imageboards, if anyone knows for sure feel free to correct me, but, it's called "lolisnatcher" and the icon is a blushing child eating a popsicle which is pretty suggestive in itself that there might be more going on than just art.
This entry was edited (9 months ago)
in reply to tree

@tree Ah, "suggestive" – that was the term I was missing. And yeah, I'm pretty sure you can access NSFW sites with Firefox, but that should be OK as long as that content isn't loaded automatically without you EXPLICITLY DEMANDING that. Err, did I say Firefox? Oops… You get the idea, right?

But yes, everybody should feel safe using my repo, so I'll not simply dismiss your concerns but follow them up. Let's wait what no-ob has to say on this. Please ping me should I not tell you within a week.

@tree
in reply to IzzyOnDroid ✅

I mean I think the difference is that firefox is not called lolifox, if someone forked firefox and called it lolifox and changed the icon to a girl blushing eating a popsicle it would obviously be different, not in functionality, but in the purpose of the specific app/ what it's promoting. It's not really fair to compare it to a web browser in that aspect. But, thanks for looking into it.
This entry was edited (9 months ago)
in reply to tree

@tree Yes, sure. And that's why I reached out to the author. The comparison here was not on the name, but on the content. I fully agree with you concerning the name. "Unlucky choice that stuck" could explain. Action to rectify would help. We'll see. I just don't want to judge by prejudice. Mistakes can happen, and we can learn from them.
@tree
in reply to IzzyOnDroid ✅

Hey I like your Repo a lot. What do you think about adding openboard Fork: github.com/Helium314/openboard?
in reply to HomemadeAdvanced

@RealMo I'd love to – but the package name collides with its origin.

Well, as I'd love to: github.com/Helium314/openboard…

All good things … are 3: I'd love to replace the outdated one on my device with this fork then, too 🙈