Skip to main content

So, folks who build web sites, I just added this conditional syntax to Kitten HTML template strings. Thoughts?

(See third code example. The is().yes().no().endIs() function chaining. My goal is to provide an alternative to the JavaScript ternary operator thatā€™s easier to read. Does this succeed? Any suggestions?)

https://codeberg.org/kitten/app#how-many-kittens-are-too-many-kittens

#interfaces #code #design

app

A web development kit thatā€™s small, purrs, and loves you.
Codeberg.org
#design #code #interfaces
in reply to Aral Balkan

masukomi
masukomi
• •
initial reaction:
i don't like the .endIf - feels really awkward.

yes & no feel wrong because it's not a yes/no question it's a true/false question. it's introducing new terminology that isn't clearer than old. if sticking with that, then what about

isTrue().yes().no()
or
test().trueResult().falseResult()

Also, if thinking about how to better it, I can't help but think about simplicity of the lisp/scheme version (test true-result false-result)
in reply to masukomi

Aral Balkan
Aral Balkan
• •
@masukomi Thanks, I donā€™t like it either but Iā€™m not sure how else to model it as the chain needs a terminator to provide the final value.

This is what I have at the momentā€¦ any ideas?

https://codeberg.org/kitten/app/src/branch/main/src/Server.js#L244

app

A web development kit thatā€™s small, purrs, and loves you.
Codeberg.org
@masukomi
in reply to Aral Balkan

masukomi
masukomi
• •
hhaheh. I'm sorry to report that my gut reaction was "...wha uh.. oh gods i hate javascript" ;)

BUT... overall looks fine
1. i think i want the option of `.is().yes()` (without `.no()`)
2. I feel like there "must" be a way to consolidate that code ...something something recursion? not sure.
in reply to masukomi

Vancha :fedora:
Vancha :fedora:
• •
@masukomi in the same line, I would also suggest the following alternative: if().thenDo().elseDo()
Not definitive, but I think a step in the right direction at least :)
@masukomi
in reply to Vancha :fedora:

Aral Balkan
Aral Balkan
• •
@vancha @masukomi I wish I could use if but itā€™s sadly a reserved word in JavaScript. Otherwise that would have been my first choice too :)
@Vancha :fedora: @masukomi
in reply to Aral Balkan

Aral Balkan
Aral Balkan
• •
@vancha @masukomi Mind you, what would work is to have a global namespace (object), e.g., kitten, and have the functions defined there.

So: kitten.if().then().else().endIf()

But Iā€™m not sure if thatā€™s better than is().yes().no().endIs() when reading it.
@Vancha :fedora: @masukomi
in reply to Aral Balkan

Vancha :fedora:
Vancha :fedora:
• •
@masukomi Ah apologies, I should have changed the if part. What i wanted to emphasize was the thenDo() and elseDo() part, to highlight that the latter two blocks are dependent on value inside the if. :) Either way I like the idea of improving on the confusing ternary operator in the first place, it's less than intuitive.
@masukomi
ā‡§