Gmail is putting ads in the middle of your inbox. Is it worth being bombarded with ads? Why bend over backwards to escape Gmail Ads when you can migrate to Tutanota?! π
Gmail is putting ads in the middle of your inbox. Is it worth being bombarded with ads? Why bend over backwards to escape Gmail Ads when you can migrate to Tutanota?! π
o grinch
in reply to Tuta • • •Antes o Google seguia o mantra do "don't be evil", atΓ© abandonar isso. Antes dizia que nΓ£o vasculharia as mensagens nem colocaria anΓΊncios, agora faz isso.
Tuta
2023-06-28 10:16:59
HernanLG
in reply to Tuta • • •Mark Wieczorek
in reply to Tuta • • •π- Tingeling -π
in reply to Tuta • • •Γ₯
in reply to Tuta • • •Tuta
Unknown parent • • •Filip π± π¦
in reply to Tuta • • •Tuta
in reply to Filip π± π¦ • • •Filip π± π¦
in reply to Tuta • • •Tuta
in reply to Filip π± π¦ • • •@hhg @thunderbird @k9mail No it would not. We don't plan to develop a bridge, but focus on adding features such as offline availability to the desktop clients - which are are way advanced in comparison to a bridge: tutanota.com/blog/posts/2fa-deβ¦
A bridge is no solution because:
* With such a bridge all data, including a search index, would be stored unencrypted in the third party email client. We aim for a solution where all data is always stored securely encrypted.
Tutanota now also supports U2F on desktop clients!
TutanotaTuta
in reply to Tuta • • •@hhg @thunderbird @k9mail
* Upon sending an email out of the third party email client, the user can't possibly know whether the email is actually going to be send end-to-end encrypted (the client can't show this as a bridge works on a different level). Therefore sending confidential emails via a bridge is essentially impossible...
* IMAP and SMTP are not the most efficient protocols especially when it comes to push notifications or to attachments of emails (which are encoded into the body).
Filip π± π¦
in reply to Tuta • • •