for like half a second, I thought this chart showed that the number of lines per test was roughly 1:1.

(That being said, looks like it at least scales somewhat linearly together.)

I was thinking less like a manager and more like a nerd. Are there pieces of code that are verily heavily tested (more tests, more lines in the tests) vs others that aren’t?

Because the very heavily tested ones (if there are any) would be interesting to look at. Probably solving some cool technical problem then.

Vs scaffolding code such as “read a command like option”. Which is kinda boring.

So just out of pure childlike curiousness :)

I’ve seen coverage reports that tells you how many times a row was ran during the tests, but that can be skewed by things such as loops.

Either way, I just got curious as curl is a fairly unusual piece of software and quite interesting in many ways beyond “it’s one heck of a useful tool”:)