help us wordsmith the #curl AI guidelines here: github.com/curl/curl/pull/1732…
docs/AI: project guidelines for AI use by bagder · Pull Request #17325 · curl/curl
Instead of adding this information in another document, I now created a new one to maybe make it easier to find, discuss and to link. At a later point we should probably merge it into the CONTRIBUT...GitHub
daniel:// stenberg:// reshared this.
Simon
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Ben Hardill
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •document contains a single word:
"Don't"
Daniel
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Curious if you have an opinion on models and how open and reproducible they are especially their training corpus licensing situation.
There's a difference between using a commercially hosted LLM service that's not open, reproducible, and has low key shady training corpus vs something like allenai.org/olmo
Does that play a role in how you see AI contributions?
OLMo from Ai2
allenai.orgdaniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Daniel • • •Daniel
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Daniel • • •Kevin Lyda
in reply to Daniel • • •@djh How can it not happen? If someone submits code they don't own it will be reverted. If someone commits code that doesn't work correctly it will be rejected.
Public software projects have been doing this for almost 50 years; why would that change? More importantly, what could it change into?
Daniel
in reply to Kevin Lyda • • •@lyda What I'm talking about is developers using AI trained on copyrighted (or otherwise questionable) training data to help them develop or generate some code.
I understand this will most likely be hard to detect that's why my question was if we should have an opinion on this or at least set expectations accordingly in this document.
daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Daniel • • •Arnaud Launay
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •《 No AI allowed. 》
You're welcome.
Richard Levitte
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •p
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Dec [{()}]
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Dec [{()}] • • •Sarah Gooding
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Sarah Gooding • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Sarah Gooding • • •