🚨 Gmail ads aren’t just annoying - they may be illegal. 🚨
Google could pay €525M for breaking privacy laws.
👉 tuta.com/blog/gmail-ads-annoyi…
This is a BIG WIN for #privacy 🔒💥
What's your reason for having switched to Tuta?
Gmail ads are not just annoying: Google is now facing a record fine in France! | Tuta
Google may have violated your privacy and is now facing the consequences: a 525 million euro fine.Tuta
Joe Dyrt
in reply to Tuta • • •/s
DigitalDigger
in reply to Tuta • • •snornik
in reply to Tuta • • •like most ISP's in DE log connections and not because they need to but because they want or got paid todo it.
if i cant trust this country how should i trust a company operating in it? also comparing yourself against the worst seems weird for me. why not compare against the privacy aware competitors?
EDIT: also there are serious efforts to undermine encryption in general.
EDIT2: sry that was maybe way to harsh and i'm happy alternatives are growing. its the current political movement and the ongoing shift to the right that makes me really worried what would happen to companies if germany goes 1933 again
snornik
in reply to Tuta • • •Edit: if you use public/privat key PGP like E2E but generate or even store the keys yourself. How can you possibly have "zero access" to a users mailbox? maybe im dumb and just dont get how this should work?
Edit2: sry for beeing picky but if the server has the keys, its the same than 2 TLS clients, encrypted yes but not E2E and not "zero access"
Tuta
in reply to snornik • • •@snornik We explain all of this here: tuta.com/encryption The key is encrypted with your password so that only you have access. We use a quantum-safe hybrid encryption protocol that works similarly to PGP, but not with the same algorithms.
And no, it's not the same as TLS, it's end-to-end encryption with only sender & recipient having access.
Everything you need to know about Tuta's encryption. | Tuta
Tutasnornik
in reply to Tuta • • •sry for the late reply. yeah thats exacly what i meant. if the keys and the passwords (hashed or not) are stored on the server, that not E2E how i understand it. thats maybe a little bit better than whatsapp but definitly not E2E. if german gov (now or in the future) wants to get all your mails. they just need to man in the middle the password. which will be no problem at all. "end-to-end encryption with only sender & recipient having access" yes exactly thats why you should not have/store the keys in the beginning. passwords need to get transmitted. and it would be E2E only if you would have no access to to keys.
Edit: yeah i read this link tuta.com/encryption that was axactly why i wrote this because this is american style peudo E2E promises.
And please: i would like this. but the keys need to stay on the client sides. thats the meaning of END2END.
Everything you need to know about Tuta's encryption. | Tuta
TutaTuta
Unknown parent • • •@canleaf And the courts have always stopped them here in Germany. tuta.com/blog/data-retention-g…
Data retention is a complex issue, while Germany has some laws on this, email is explicitly exempt due to its nature of offering private communication.
We're monitoring the development and keep fighting for your right to privacy!
Germany: Data retention to be abolished once and for all. | Tuta
TutaBananaCocoYuck
in reply to Tuta • • •Tuta
Unknown parent • • •Son0David
in reply to Tuta • • •