in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

This one is really amusing.. "use after free" when the example code *literally* calls SSL_free then reuses the pointer. my brother in christ your "proof of concept" is literally just faulty code that has nothing to do with openssl

hackerone.com/reports/3242005

in reply to the vessel of morganna

@astraleureka this sort of problem has always existed in open-source. You would get trivial PRs like someone updating your dependencies for you or, my favorite — reformatting your code to their liking. As if I couldn't have done it myself in one minute if I felt the need to do this in my project. AI just lowers the barrier even more for these "I have to contribute something, anything" types.
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

while everyone is sharing their outrage -- and it is outrageous -- your ending note here is spot on. How do we stop this?

This is going to burn maintainers out.

We're going to need to come up with something. Maybe it will look something like CLA-signing bots, but what could submitters sign? A statement that they've read the project policy on slop?
I can't say I'm confident that would help.