daniel:// stenberg:// 9 months ago • • daniel:// stenberg:// 9 months ago • • 25 years later, #curl is now at 0 sscanf calls - and we do not allow new ones to get added #curl Languages Search Text Share via ...
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// DJGummikuh in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • 9 months ago • • from someone with extremely little C++ Experience, why is this noteworthy? is sscanf prone to abuse or anything? Languages Search Text Share via ...
in reply to DJGummikuh daniel:// stenberg:// in reply to DJGummikuh • 9 months ago • • @DJGummikuh it is easy to get wrong. I wrote about it a little in my weekly email last week: lists.haxx.se/pipermail/danielβ¦[Daniel's week] December 6, 2024lists.haxx.se @DJGummikuh Languages Search Text Share via ...
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// DJGummikuh in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • 9 months ago • • aah! The good old "too 'powerful' for its own good" tune π Thanks for clarification π This entry was edited (9 months ago) Languages Search Text Share via ...
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// Piggo in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • 9 months ago • • is strparse a reusable component that could be put in other projects to get rid of sscanf? Languages Search Text Share via ...
in reply to Piggo daniel:// stenberg:// in reply to Piggo • 9 months ago • • @piggo @DJGummikuh not quite: it provides functions that allowed us to remove the final sscanf calls we had. It is not generic enough to replace all sscanf calls. It could be the beginning of such a function set. @Piggo @DJGummikuh Languages Search Text Share via ...
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// lemgandi in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • 9 months ago • • That is Heroic! Languages Search Text Share via ...
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// Chris π π§ in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • 8 months ago • • good old sscanf, a parser for the common man Languages Search Text Share via ...
DJGummikuh
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to DJGummikuh • • •[Daniel's week] December 6, 2024
lists.haxx.seDJGummikuh
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Piggo
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Piggo • • •lemgandi
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Chris π π§
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •