Skip to main content

in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

I love curl, but decided to boycott this particular survey because of my intense google-phobia (looked like google forms). I hope google feels the pain from my boycott. 😄

Maybe try #FramaForms or #LimeSurvey or something?

Anyway, you can have my vote here: curl is great, I give it 5/5 in awesomeness score.

in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

I answered it, but came away feeling disrespectful for having used so few of the features...

It's a great piece of software. I can't imagine it not being available.

This entry was edited (6 months ago)
in reply to Patrizia

@patrizia no reason to feel that way. Those features will be waiting for you till that day you'll need them! 😃
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

Got some feedback on the survey itself: The survey feels a bit overwhelming as I only use a limited set of functionality 😇 For my purposes I can say: it's stable, well-maintained, and it does what it needs to do. So visiting the website and things like that is something I rarely do.

Just a thought: Maybe the survey (next year) can be tuned to show only the remaining relevant sections based on the given answers? Or split into multiple types (light user, curl contributor, curl dev)?

in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

@sirocyl I feel a bit weird filling this out considering I rarely use curl directly, but I do use it sometimes and I think that that's a case you want to have covered in the survey so I did fill it out.

I forgot to specify that my favorite option is -I because I didn't realize it until just now though

in reply to endrift

@endrift @sirocyl thank you! - and yes I do want as many different aspects and kinds of users as possible represented.
in reply to daniel:// stenberg://

The trurl usage question needs a "well, I have *now*" option 😃 (I hadn't even heard of it, possibly because it only hit ubuntu at 23.10, but I immediately started messing with it; I definitely expect to be committing shell-script-crimes with it in the future.)

Also learned that --unix-socket existed - great to see it but I wish some actual browsers would support it (I have *so* many projects that would be improved by http-over-unix-socket-over-ssh...)