✊ Tuta Mail to the EU: If you pass Chat Control, we’re forced to sue you.

We will never build backdoors or spy on our users. Privacy is a human right, guaranteed to everyone by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

#StopChatControl #privacymatters

Read the full comment 👉 tuta.com/blog/chat-control-cri…

This entry was edited (1 day ago)

Tuta reshared this.

in reply to Tuta

@EUCommission Understand this: people do not want this and will do whatever it takes to stop it. Here's an example - Tuta is making it clear. And I'm telling you myself: if force has to be used - so be it. Privacy is not something we will give up without a fight.

#ChatControl #FightChatControl #StopChatControl #Privacy

in reply to Kierkegaanks regretfully

@Kierkegaanks I've seen multiple claims to this effect with no evidence.

The proposals as stated have been requiring providers of e2ee messaging to do the backdoors, which would basically mean the corporate shit platforms get backdoored and the real stuff first fights then ignores the law if they don't win, and possibly gets removed from app stores, relegated to sideloading.

Nobody wants to be the party doing the backdooring. Apple is not going to step up to do it at the OS level, and ruin their reputation, when they can say "the regulation puts the burden on chat providers, not us" (except iMessage which they'd probably backdoor).

in reply to Kierkegaanks regretfully

@Kierkegaanks @dalias Better disable Recall right away: tuta.com/blog/how-to-disable-m…
in reply to Tuta

i dont get that chat control. how does this work with open source messengers, like dunno, where encryption is client side and the server acts as a broker. how in snowdens name can you add a backdoor in there?

especially if you only act as broker with like a protocol that any app could implement.

like, if i encrypt my mail, is a 3 letter agency taking me to blacksite?!

This entry was edited (1 day ago)