Skip to main content

in reply to fedipact.online

From an accessibility perspective, I wouldn’t be so dismissive.

  • A contrast accessibility calculator shows that concerns about color contrast go beyond personal taste. (edit: looks like this will be addressed, acc. to a follow-up post).
  • Elements like links violate WCAG 2.2 SC 1.4.1: Use of color by using color alone to distinguish meaning, which is especially problematic here since the first links are also headings; making them bold and colored seems to rightly suggest a heading but not a link. A visual distinction that specifically suggests a link, such as an underline, would fix this.

Beyond what people were saying in those threads: the list entries with list-style-type: none won’t be read/navigated as bullet points by a screen reader, but most screen readers will announce every single black heart emoji.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Seirdy

edited to reflect one of these three points being acknowledged.
⇧