Of all the questionable things about AI, I'm starting to think its biggest crime is simply the staggering amount of resources it has pointlessly drawn away from other, more important work and the way it has corrupted even organisations that were previously doing great work in some misguided, race-to-the-bottom belief that this is actually the most important think for humankind.

reshared this

in reply to Jamie Teh

true, we've even had a complaint that the development time spent on ai image description should have been spent on more pressing issues. I did explain that the work was done by an external project and surely having external developers familiar able to work on our code is a good thing, even if you don't use this particular feature. You can't win either way. But at least we were very clear to ensure it is offline & private, and if you don't to use it, don't enable it and you're no worse off than now. Or if you want to use the online models, keep using the add-ons you're using now
in reply to Jamie Teh

> Worse, it's not just limited to major tech companies. This even applies to some smaller ones, even some not-for-profits

... including Mozilla, and some governments, including the EU;

disintermedia.net.nz/open-lett…

@Quentin

This entry was edited (5 days ago)
in reply to Jamie Teh

Under capitalism the vast majority of human labour is steered towards a myopic focus: profit for the capitalist class, that means more hours on the job less time spent with people you care about.

"
The evil of the present system is therefore not that the “surplus-value” of production goes to the capitalist[...]The evil lies in the possibility of a surplus-value existing
" Pëtr Kropotkin - The Conquest of Bread
libraryqxxiqakubqv3dc2bend2koq…

This entry was edited (6 days ago)
in reply to Jamie Teh

I don't think it is a coincidence that the demographics most responsible for pushing AI out onto people are also demographics that have learned to become frighteningly good at both personal and cultural levels of deflection.

Historically, certain groups have been really good at deflection and changing subjects and focus away from any topics that could disrupt the status quo around inequities and privileges.

So yeah: agree that AI is and has been a huge cultural level ...distraction

in reply to Jamie Teh

The amount of resources it is using, especially when compared to how much the same work would take when done by a human, is... greatly exaggerated, a Chat GPT prompt (with a modern model) uses as much energy as ~10 seconds of Netflix afaik.

You're absolutely right on your second point though. While AI is definitely going to change the world, your site for ordering takeout burgers or whatever does not need three AI assistants.

in reply to Jamie Teh

Yeah, that part you're not wrong about.

There are a couple of orgs for which being "part of the AI revolution" absolutely makes sense (Google comes to mind), but I 100% agree about the rest.

It's not always obvious which kind you are, though. In hintsight, the crypto revolution was best avoided unless you work with international payments / 3rd-world countries, while anybody who avoided the mobile and internet revolutions is no longer with us, and may they rest in peace.

Maybe this is just inevitable, maybe it's better to potentially waste some resources than to potentially face irrelevance.

in reply to Jamie Teh

Yeah, that part you're not wrong about.

There are a couple of orgs for which being "part of the AI revolution" absolutely makes sense (Google comes to mind), but I 100% agree about the rest.

It's not always obvious which kind you are, though. In hintsight, the crypto revolution was best avoided unless you work with international payments / 3rd-world countries, while anybody who avoided the mobile and internet revolutions is no longer with us, and may they rest in peace.

Maybe this is just inevitable, maybe it's better to potentially waste some resources than to potentially face irrelevance.

in reply to Jamie Teh

1000% agree
Im furious about AI. It's being sold as this amazing resource that is so good for us all. But it isn't.
Apart from the VAST drain on energy (that we none of us can afford financially or resource-wise globally) it's a drain on us individually. We WILL become stupider and less capable in all sorts of ways.

Im sick of it all. And we are never given a choice about it.
Sick of business interests telling me i need this or that technology that I really don't need and really don't want.
Sure there are exceptions:
disabled ppl or elderly need AI and huge cars and Alexa/Siri and driverless vehicles to make their lives way way easier. And that's what it should be there for.

But for the majority of ppl those things are superfluous. We don't need them. We really don't.
But we are being MADE to want them bc the market gives lucrative profits for a select few if we ALL have to use them to pay for the research and development. I don't need things delivered to my frigging garden by done, but a small number of ppl do. God forbid someone develops these things out of the goodness of their hearts bc elderly need help. But no, let's squeeze the cash out of everyone on the planet telling them they need some delivery bc it's cool apparently.

So we are made to use internet banking bc then they take cash away. We have streamed entertainment rather than going out and making our own bc all the pubs and cinemas are shutting. We are made to use chat bots on phones bc the take ppl away. It makes me effing furious

#AI #aiwillkillus #aiwillbeourdownfall #aiwillnotfixit #aiwilleliminateusall

This entry was edited (4 days ago)