It's absolutely astounding how disconnected they are from the Linux community. What's even really the point of the LF if they just post and think like any SF tech startup ?
I was an individual member of LF back when that was a thing (around 2015 iirc). Removing individual members was a huge mistake, there's no counter balance to the large corporate members any more.
@linuxfoundation@social.lfx.dev blocked them. What a horrible take from an organisation that should know better. At least they have shown their true colours and nobody needs to wonder 🤦
@chpietsch Wait, you’re telling me trillion-dollar corporations like Google, Meta, X, etc., aren’t on my side? What next? Billionaires aren’t our friends?
Linux Foundation is extremely corporate. It's a 501(c)6 trade association, not any kind of charity. It is extremely financially motivated. LF can sometimes be useful to free and open source software, but one must never rely on them to advance principles over their large corporate member interests.
(I'm speaking here as someone who co-founded what became a LF Collaborative Project, so I have some experience with them.)
But they are right. There are lots of municipalities that instinctively are precautious because of GDPR rules about data that has nothing to do with personal data protection. Just because people now think that data should be secret. Open data is what fuel lots things like open street map and what not.
Yep, just look at their "members" page: linuxfoundation.org/about/memb… Among the top "platinum" corporate members are Microsoft and Meta. The Linux Foundation is funded by wealthy corporations that are absolutely NOT on our side. All the big corporations that gather our data for nefarious purposes including giving it to the government on request are on this page.
Tofu
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Wolf480pl
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
Unknown parent • • •daniel:// stenberg://
Unknown parent • • •daniel:// stenberg://
Unknown parent • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Thibault
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •It's absolutely astounding how disconnected they are from the Linux community. What's even really the point of the LF if they just post and think like any SF tech startup ?
It's embarassing.
BigLinter
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_Fo…
its always important to understand what a "foundation" is founded on.
non-profit technology consortium for development of Linux and open source
Contributors to Wikimedia projects (Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.)✍️ #MorpurgoMedia.nl
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Paul Barker
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Tony
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Snark Week Global
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •child of baphomet
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Daniel Schildt
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Marcus Schwarz 🇪🇺
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Roland
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Andrew Douglass
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Aral Balkan
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •@chpietsch Wait, you’re telling me trillion-dollar corporations like Google, Meta, X, etc., aren’t on my side? What next? Billionaires aren’t our friends?
;)
F4GRX Sébastien
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •The Penguin of Evil
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •They are on the side of their paying members, that's how it's supposed to work. That just happens to sometimes align.
Fortunately they are and always have been terrible at PR so it's easy to tell what their actual members want.
No corporation is on your side unless you own a controlling share of it.
Toni Aittoniemi
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Skjeggtroll
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •"Railings near cliff edges fuel a climate of risk aversion slowing free movement."
ETA: Or maybe more topical: "Passwords fuel a climate of risk aversion slowing the flow of information."
krejgo
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Bredroll
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •espn
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Tomek Gieorgijewski
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Open Data - No, thank you!
Kerplunk
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Data privacy is in the way says Linux Foundation
Take a look at
linuxfoundation.org/about/memb…
Which will make matters clearer. It is an Industrial Interest Group.
Members of the Linux Foundation
www.linuxfoundation.orgBen Pfaff
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Linux Foundation is extremely corporate. It's a 501(c)6 trade association, not any kind of charity. It is extremely financially motivated. LF can sometimes be useful to free and open source software, but one must never rely on them to advance principles over their large corporate member interests.
(I'm speaking here as someone who co-founded what became a LF Collaborative Project, so I have some experience with them.)
Jan
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •mth
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Fish Id Wardrobe
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Sashin
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Madies Scythian
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •linuxfoundation.org/about/memb…
Members of the Linux Foundation
www.linuxfoundation.orguis
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Pascal d'Hermilly
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •But they are right. There are lots of municipalities that instinctively are precautious because of GDPR rules about data that has nothing to do with personal data protection. Just because people now think that data should be secret. Open data is what fuel lots things like open street map and what not.
@linuxfoundation
thezerobit
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Among the top "platinum" corporate members are Microsoft and Meta. The Linux Foundation is funded by wealthy corporations that are absolutely NOT on our side. All the big corporations that gather our data for nefarious purposes including giving it to the government on request are on this page.
Members of the Linux Foundation
www.linuxfoundation.orgᛋᛁᚵᛁᛋᛘᚢᚾᛑ ᚾᛁᚾᛃᛅ
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •