If you read the footer of amazon.com with a screenreader, this is what it says:
© 1996-2025, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates
Test: amzn-nv-flyout-healthy-choice
Test: nav-rufus-disc-txt
Test: a-truncate-cut
Test: sp-cc-wrapper
Test: .mo-wp
Test: sp-cc
Test: .amzn-box-inner
Test: .js-order-card
Test: pldn-deep-link
Test: add-to-cart-btn
Test: amzn-nav-app-banner-container
Test: .sparkle-container
More money than God and they still can't propperly enclose their containers 😂
This entry was edited (9 hours ago)
reshared this
ondrosik
in reply to Drew Mochak • •Drew Mochak likes this.
Drew Mochak
in reply to ondrosik • • •Pitermach
in reply to Drew Mochak • • •miki
in reply to Pitermach • • •@pitermach @ondrosik PDFs are also full of such things.
Many people redact PDF content by covering it up with a black or white rectangle, forgetting that, unlike in purely visual formats, that operation does basically nothing in PDF. The content is still there, the renderer is just instructed to draw a white rectangle which occupies the same position and covers it visually.
Sometimes, you can also find sloppy employees leaving notes to other people working on the PDF, especially if the documents are only intended for print, and the electronic version is only given out in special circumstances.
Drew Mochak
in reply to miki • • •@miki Thanks, you reminded me to post about the Epstine files which can be "hacked" via this "method" (the hacking method being you read them normally in your browser)
@pitermach @ondrosik
miki
in reply to Drew Mochak • • •@pitermach @ondrosik There's also the little known trick of... reading PDF image alt descriptions.
Because Adobe Acrobat puts the *full path* of the image file there.
miki
in reply to Drew Mochak • • •Drew Mochak
in reply to miki • • •miki
in reply to Drew Mochak • • •@pitermach @ondrosik See also, cookie pop-ups which don't obscure the page if you're a screen reader user.
That's one accessibility issue that I'd selfishly like to stay unfixed.