Skip to main content

mastodon - Link to source

Warning: There’s an app for blurring out sensitive information in images called Obfuscate being featured on #GNOME Software right now.

Please be careful.

The default blur setting can easily be reversed.

The default should be to replace the areas with a solid colour or a pattern not derived from the underlying information.

This really should not be a featured app in its current state.

#security #linux #apps #obfuscate

A code snippet with some text blurred out.
#linux #apps #security #gnome #obfuscate
in reply to Aral Balkan

thm | tomáš א mládek
mastodon - Link to source
thm | tomáš א mládek
• •

😬 This really should be common knowledge, I've seen lots of people make the same mistake.

Having this misfeature in a "featured app" is absolutely dangerous.

in reply to Aral Balkan

Aral Balkan
mastodon - Link to source
Aral Balkan
• •
For a visual example of how trivial it is to reverse such techniques, see hackaday.com/2022/02/23/pixela…

Pixelating Text Not A Good Idea

People have gotten much savvier about computer security in the last decade or so. Most people know that sending a document with sensitive information in it is a no-no, so many people try to redact …
Hackaday
in reply to Aral Balkan

jan ale
mastodon - Link to source
jan ale
• •
Contents of blur

extension

this.addEventListenerFile(filePath)

in reply to jan ale

Aral Balkan
mastodon - Link to source
Aral Balkan
• •
Contents of blur
Yep. (And yes, that’s an autocomplete corruption – the screenshot was from a bug report I filed for Helix Editor) :)
in reply to Aral Balkan

Aral Balkan
mastodon - Link to source
Aral Balkan
• •
Contents of blur
And, of course, thank you for the case in point :)
in reply to Aral Balkan

Aral Balkan
mastodon - Link to source
Aral Balkan
• •

Right, the app’s developer has agreed to change the default tool to pure colour replacement (which is secure).

While he wants to keep the blur tool also (for non-sensitive stuff/aesthetic uses), I hope that he’ll be adding a warning to it when it is first used that alerts people not to use it for sensitive information and/or that the app description reflects that.

All in all, a positive development.

And now I can go back to coding…

in reply to Aral Balkan

was B (this is my old account)
mastodon - Link to source
was B (this is my old account)
• •
it seems like this could be achieved more safely with a combined effect like pixelate first and then blur
in reply to Aral Balkan

Trisha Lynn 🇵🇭 🇺🇸 🇨🇦
mastodon - Link to source
Trisha Lynn 🇵🇭 🇺🇸 🇨🇦
• •
Right on with you for pointing out a thing and the developer working on it "toot" de suite!
Unknown parent

Aral Balkan
mastodon - Link to source
Aral Balkan
• •
Well at least he came around eventually – that’s more than you can say for some folks :) It’s also understandable that folks become defensive sometimes when you criticise their baby. That said, all I really care about is that no one is hurt by revealing sensitive information about themselves. Fingers crossed this will be a quick update.
in reply to Aral Balkan

Fernanda
mastodon - Link to source
Fernanda
• •
I really don't understand why the dev got so defensive at the point of denial, just say "I'll check this" even without planning to do anything would still have been a better first response.
⇧