“Palantir Technologies had a secret plan to deepen its relationship with the UK’s National Health Service without public scrutiny.
The US data-analytics company aimed to buy up smaller rivals that already had an existing relationship with the NHS, according to emails and strategy documents seen by Bloomberg. This approach would hopefully allow Palantir to avoid further scrutiny in working with one of the largest depositories of heath data. ”
Arne Babenhauserheide
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •Dammbruch! Palantir gewinnt den Rahmenvertrag für Data Mining in der deutschen Polizei (2022)
HoustonjobconnectionAral Balkan reshared this.
Arne Babenhauserheide
in reply to Arne Babenhauserheide • • •Aral Balkan
in reply to Arne Babenhauserheide • • •Arne Babenhauserheide
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •isobel
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •ghostdancer
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •Aral Balkan
in reply to ghostdancer • • •The Education of a Libertarian
Cato Unboundkunt
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •the irony of this post is:
inkl is a news bundling service; it doesn't provide any journalism. All it does in this case is to fetch the original article from Bloomberg.
Their practice per se is a form data farming, the only bright side is it's not as sensitive as health care data.
Aral Balkan
in reply to kunt • • •@kunt Their business model, however, is based on subscriptions. So let’s differentiate that from people farming which is farming the data of human beings. That’s very different to bundling stories from news outlets.
Also, they do write an editorial weekly wrap which I enjoy reading.
kunt
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •I'm glad to see you are defending their business model, and highlight the fact that they do a weekly wrap instead of no journalism at all.
However, the irony was referring to your post, which it contains a link about data harvesting whilst the link itself also harvests data - try rejecting cookie and that link would ends in loop.
I wouldn't have mentioned it if it's a direct link to the source Bloomberg.
Aral Balkan
in reply to kunt • • •