Excuse me, did my own Mastodon instance that I own and control just rate limit me?
#letsCopyBigTech #whatCouldPossiblyGoWrong #mastodon
Excuse me, did my own Mastodon instance that I own and control just rate limit me?
#letsCopyBigTech #whatCouldPossiblyGoWrong #mastodon
Aral Balkan
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •Aral Balkan
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •Masto.host
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •Hello Aral, rate limits are hardcoded in Mastodon: github.com/mastodon/mastodon/s…
There are no other rate limits applied on my end.
So, I can't really do much on my end without forking and changing the Mastodon code. Sorry :|
Search · rate limit · mastodon/mastodon
GitHubAral Balkan
in reply to Masto.host • • •Thanks! And no worries, I understand. You don’t want to maintain a fork of that beast, trust me :)
Seems I have to devote some time in the future to swapping out Mastodon with a fediverse server designed for a single person. I believe there are a couple of projects in that area.
It’s ridiculous to host something designed to hold a million people for just one person. It’s like living in a skyscraper by yourself: not good for you, not good for the environment, or for anyone :)
Masto.host
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •oh yeah, I don't want to fork that beast :)
Still, I don't think that the public APIs rate limit should be removed. That would open the door to all sorts of attacks or abuses.
But I agree that rate limits should not affect regular usage of the web interface. For me, is more why does this happen/how to fix it and less on how to disable it.
About the single user software, 100%. I can think of so many way to make that software much simpler and less resource intensive.
CC @c3po
Robert Lender
in reply to Masto.host • • •Aral Balkan
in reply to Robert Lender • • •Sadly, ActivityPub itself makes this difficult but it’s not impossible by any means. But it’s not what ActivityPub was designed for. (So we are somewhat trying to stuff a square peg into a round hole.)
The small web stuff, on the other hand, is being designed with specifically this use case in mind. (But isn’t usable yet. Which means there’s lots of value in exploring these solutions on the fediverse and getting folks thinking in this direction as soon as possible.)
𝖑𝖚𝖈𝖎𝖋𝖊𝖗
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •Eugen Rochko
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •Aral Balkan
in reply to Eugen Rochko • • •Because it’s built for you (the moderator/administrator), not for the person with the account.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m hugely thankful for Mastodon. Without it we wouldn’t have the fediverse. But the level of centralisation is a problem.
You’re designing for 800,000 in one place (because that’s what you have to moderate – a task I do not envy you), not 800,000 separate instances.
This is the Achilles' heel of Mastodon/the fediverse.
And, again, I’m hugely grateful it exists.
FiXato
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •looks like there has been a feature request to make this configurable, open since early 2021
@Gargron
Allow administrators to configure rate limits · Issue #15832 · mastodon/mastodon
GitHubDavid Chartier
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •Aral Balkan
in reply to David Chartier • • •Aral Balkan
Unknown parent • • •LPS
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •fatboy
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •Amit Gawande
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •Aral Balkan
in reply to Amit Gawande • • •Aral Balkan
Unknown parent • • •Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp)
in reply to Aral Balkan • • •Aral Balkan
in reply to Alexandre Oliva (moved to @lxo@gnusocial.jp) • • •