it is curious how many people feel they need to ask me why #curl is not moving off #GitHub
The cold and boring answer is money. GitHub sponsors us with a crapload of CI infra that there is no other company even close to doing.
So while they may be an AI-first delusional company, they help our project so much more than all other hosting sites combined.
It would be reckless and irresponsible of us to ignore this.
Wolf480pl
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Wolf480pl • • •I don't find that a particularly interesting question because it's an unlikely extreme. Everything in life is a balance of pros and cons, and so is running an Open Source project. We make decisions every single day that impact how the project looks like tomorrow.
We will continue to make such decisions until the project dies. A service we use going rogue is just one thing that can happen, and one I consider is reasonably unlikely.
We react. We overcome. We struggle on.
Wolf480pl
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Jamie Teh
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •F4GRX Sébastien
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Richard Levitte
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Mind you, there are some projects that have their main repo elsewhere, but have a mirror on github to access CI.
I'm not exactly sure how much that complicates things, yet. I have it my mind to do some personal research on the matter, and will hopefully remember to share what I find.
daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Richard Levitte • • •@levitte that assumes GitHub thinks that's a cool setup to still sponsor, which I suspect they might not.
Also: that's just complicating things, that's not really "moving off GitHub".
Richard Levitte
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •max64lowes
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •PerYourHealth Login – Pay Bill at www.peryourhealth.com
Joshua Flores (starbucks-secretmenu.com)daniel:// stenberg://
Unknown parent • • •Sascha Cowley
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Aurélien
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Aurélien • • •Aurélien
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Aurélien • • •Aurélien
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Aurélien • • •Aurélien
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Aurélien • • •soc
in reply to Aurélien • • •@opsocket Especially considering that such a contribution would be considered "reckless and irresponsible" from the get-go.
Boomers. 🤦♀️
daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to soc • • •soc
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to soc • • •soc
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Neil
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to Neil • • •Jim Fuller
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Amoshias
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •why is it curious? AI is a blight, and many people think that, wherever possible, it should be avoided.
You have a good reason to stay on GitHub; I can see different people making different choices but I don't fault yours. But at the same time, to not understand why people would question it is odd.
contrasocial
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to contrasocial • • •JimmyChezPants 🇨🇦
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Sysadmin/DevOps here, who worked on CI/CD for a while specifically..
Serious question: exactly how much CI infra (which, for those unfamiliar, actually means Linux computers, Free Software, network gear and bandwidth) are you guys using, exactly? And just how big is your team, that you need so much infrastructure?
If they were paying salaries for full-time devs, I could understand, but CI Infrastructure is a pretty small problem, all things considered, and solvable with a modest budget, if you have a competent DevOps person available. Is it that you have not found any DevOps people to volunteer? Cause I'd volunteer.
Perhaps the team is dispersed around the world, and Microsoft's presumed access to fast global pipes makes it possible for them to deliver, where a self-managed solution would be cost-prohibitive for connectivity reasons?
I'm going to assume I just don't understand the complexity of your CI needs, and I do not demand you explain anything to me specifically. But I would also urge you to consider that corporate largesse is not a dependable support stream; you should assume that it will get yanked at some inopportune moment by ignorant bean counters who do not, and do not care to, understand, and have plans in place for what you will do when all that infrastructure becomes unavailable to you overnight.
daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to JimmyChezPants 🇨🇦 • • •sarah tonin
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •daniel:// stenberg://
in reply to sarah tonin • • •Jan Strnad
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Oberst Enzian
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •Ah the old golden handcuffs. And you lack the suicidal courage necessary to effectively defy evil. Sounds like the problem nearly all Westerners have these days.
You suck.
Dave C.
in reply to daniel:// stenberg:// • • •