Mint egy másik hozzászóló is írta: nekem is teljesen új már eleve az is, hogy az Apple eladja ezeket az adatokat.
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20… #apple #privacy
arstechnica.com/tech-policy/20… #apple #privacy
Siri “unintentionally” recorded private convos; Apple agrees to pay $95M
Apple users may get $20 each for up to five Siri-enabled devices.Ashley Belanger (Ars Technica)
Winter blue tardis🇧🇬🇭🇺
in reply to barcaxavi • • •👾 Attila Gonda
in reply to barcaxavi • • •én azt sajnálom (kis kár örvendéssel), hogy rengeteg ember bújt mögéjük a "Privacy. That’s iPhone" szlogenjük miatt és remélte hogy az érdekeit képviseli a cég, szemben Google-lel.
ezzel most egyértelművé vált hogy nem több ügyes marketing fogásnál, és egy szavát sem lehet hinni a cégeknek, senki nem nézi a vásárlók igényeit és egy "melyik mainstream telefont vegyem" kérdés esetén a személyes igényeken túl nincs értelme moralizálni. (és ezutóbbinak mondjuk eddig sem volt sok értelme)
Winter blue tardis🇧🇬🇭🇺
in reply to 👾 Attila Gonda • • •👾 Attila Gonda
in reply to Winter blue tardis🇧🇬🇭🇺 • • •@tardis I don't necessary understand your take. on one hand you're pointing fingers at the users they should know better but on the other you're saying there's nothing one can do because everyone will sell their data anyway.
yes, users could educate themselves better how to protect their privacy.
but expecting everyone to question a loud privacy stand from a company when EVERY tech news site announced them as *the privacy hero who protects from evil ads* is a bit of a stretch.
👾 Attila Gonda
in reply to 👾 Attila Gonda • • •@tardis also, I think "careful what they share" is a very vague exclamation. in general most people don't *share* top secrets from their lives with Siri, search engines, or even during a small talk with their family.
but the problem is **every** part of your life can used against you when a company doesn't respect your privacy. (just think about the wild example of the charged woman (women?) in the US who searched for abortion clinics when the state outlawed it)
Winter blue tardis🇧🇬🇭🇺
in reply to 👾 Attila Gonda • • •barcaxavi
in reply to Winter blue tardis🇧🇬🇭🇺 • • •@tardis @pcdevil my general takeaway is, even above the privacy topic:
we gave too much power to these companies and most of them are misusing it. Regulations and bans are somewhat hurting them, but It would be better to not give them our money and our data.
Winter blue tardis🇧🇬🇭🇺
in reply to barcaxavi • • •Winter blue tardis🇧🇬🇭🇺
in reply to Winter blue tardis🇧🇬🇭🇺 • • •👾 Attila Gonda
in reply to barcaxavi • • •@tardis agree 100%.
to be fair I'm laughing at this payment, $90M is nothing when it comes to selling users data 😞
Winter blue tardis🇧🇬🇭🇺
in reply to 👾 Attila Gonda • • •Winter blue tardis🇧🇬🇭🇺
in reply to Winter blue tardis🇧🇬🇭🇺 • • •barcaxavi
in reply to Winter blue tardis🇧🇬🇭🇺 • • •But there are some cool projects for smartphones that are worth the look (@GrapheneOS , @calyxinstitute , @LineageOS), and also some great alternative software to use in replacement of the apps and services of the big players.
Winter blue tardis🇧🇬🇭🇺
in reply to barcaxavi • • •