Thank you!
I tried to use it and checked

• a toilet where mestrual products are already mapped: I could not see an indication to that yet
• a toilet where no menstrual products where mapped: There was no question regarding that.

Did I miss something? I have never tried mapcomplete (which seems amazing!) so it's very possible I misunderstand something

Sure:

• 11082891714 has toilets:menstrual_products=yes which does not seem to be reflected in the text description
• 9015083896 says "No free menstrual products are available here" although there is no entry toilets:menstrual_products=no- I guess this is a sensible default? But then it'd maybe make sense to still include it in the questions? Same for 11128525907

There are two ways to tag toilets. One of them is `amenity=toilets`, as stand-alone point. Another way is to have `toilets=yes`, to indicate that a certain amenity/shop/restaurant/... has toilets available. In the latter case, this is not the main attribute.

MapComplete has _two_ layers for toilets: one for the 'stand alone' case, another for the `toilet_at_amenity` case. And I only added the new module to the standalone case, where node/11082891714 is one at an amenity.

(I'm personally opposed to having `toilet=yes` and _much_ prefer the toilets to mapped separately. It is a stepping stone to proper indoor mapping and allows for more nuance, e.g. what if the toilets have different opening hours then the entire amenity? What if one wants to add a picture of the toilets specifically?

However, it is quick and easy start)

About the other cases without entry, I indeed assumed that a missing `menstrual_products`-attribute implies that there _are_ no menstrual products available. The only cases I've seen menstrual products handed out was at CCC (which is very queer-friendly and in Germany).

However, I cannot say much, as I don't frequent the 'female only'-parts of toilets... Let's hope this changes!