As part of my job, I have to evaluate AI tools. Part of that evaluation is pushing them to their limit. Today, I realised Cursor has a setting where if you critique its work enough, it goes silent and refuses to apply changes.
It's a moody junior dev whose overconfidence and bravado quickly turn to surly silence when their work is questioned. The happy, helpful (and frequently wrong) AI is gone, replaced by a useless one with a bad attitude that won't make it past the next performance review.
Christ. I'm used to managing engineers, but I draw the line at managing AIs.
Tom
in reply to Tom • • •Steve Holden
in reply to Tom • • •Tom
in reply to Steve Holden • • •Curioso 🍉 🇺🇦 (jgg)
in reply to Tom • • •We are at a weird stage of AI evolution at which their developers and users are hell bent on them behaving like people, which is nuts, doesn't make any sense, and is frustrating as hell because it makes you fell like you are working with a fucking immature lying moron. I don't want a fake human. I want a machine that works.
Stop all the apologizing, sycophanting, and paraphrasing. Stop all the thank yous and pleases. Stop all the "natural language" nonsense.
Let them be machines. That's a feature, not a bug.
reshared this
Cleverson reshared this.