but you know, even GPT-5.2 made the remove button an "X" icon that was just a span it was injecting into the div with the letter X. That's fucking right. In 2025. GPT still coded an inaccessible element, because of course, nothing in its training data has changed otherwise. Even though I had custom instructions set to make things WCAG compliant, to follow level AA, when it comes to this particular detail, it reverted to its "PRIMORDIAL " training. So that is how much you can trust these shits to make accessible content even still.
This is our version of 'Maria durch ein Dornwald ging', a song by an anonymous composer probably around 1600 in middle Germany. It's also possible however th...
I literally JUST finished uploading a video about how Jews in Canada are being targeted by Muslims less than a week after a foiled terrorist plot by three Mu...
@dodecahedron Oh lol, well there's that then. The sleep app should give you a run-down on how you slept pretty much every morning. This is a new thing.
@mcourcel @dodecahedron it does! I just didn't realize it worked without you having to set up like schedules and stuff. But now I will definitely be checking that out now
@oschonrock - looking at the code, this seems to be a hardened version of the original function? Is there a case to include the in the original lib? (Maybe as a new function if there could be backwards compatibility issues)
Interesting to see that the graph is not strictly decreasing — meaning that there were commits that added new strcpy() lines as late as this year, despite the projects' review efforts. 🤔
Nonetheless, congrats on reaching 0%. Is there a plan to prevent calls to "bad" functions from sneaking back in again?
altf4
in reply to Thijs • • •Thijs
in reply to altf4 • • •