Hello, all. I was just asked to DJay a wedding in a few months. The couple getting married wants the music set mixed with a constant flow, not just a bunch of songs. Does anyone know of accessible DJay software out there that is easy for blind people to use? This is not something like station playlist. I'm talking about DJay softwar that you would use at clubs, partys, for beat matching, ETC. it also needs to connect to spotify. Any platform is open for discussion, accept linux. *grins* #Accessibility
Tony Gebhard
in reply to Joe G • • •Peter Vágner
in reply to Tony Gebhard • •Mixxx DJ Software likes this.
Mixxx DJ Software
in reply to Peter Vágner • • •Public view of Mixxx | Zulip team chat
ZulipPeter Vágner
in reply to Mixxx DJ Software • •@Mixxx DJ Software Thank you for nice words, for being usefull and available during all these years, even for being open to further accessibility improvements.
Almost a year ago I have posted some preliminary summary and some ideas related to screen reader accessibility in this github issue. I have commented on both classic as wel as QML based UI and I still find it relevant today.
I'm still stuck on trying to improve screen reader access to QML based library controls.
I can share my little tweaks and continue seeking more help if you find those comments I've posted understandable.
It turns out I may not be competent enough to make significant progress on my own but I assume together we can make it happen.
I am mainly looking into existing QT / QML accessibility features, common sense, keyboard controls and screen reader usage. I haven't used AI for this.
Huge thanks for pointers, hints and words of encouragement you may add.
Mixxx DJ Software likes this.
Mixxx DJ Software
in reply to Peter Vágner • • •Mixxx - GSoC 2026: Rebuilding the LateNight Theme in QML
Mixxx DJ SoftwareMixxx DJ Software
in reply to Mixxx DJ Software • • •Feature: Screen Reader support in Latenight QML · Issue #17051 · mixxxdj/mixxx
ywwg (GitHub)Peter Vágner likes this.
Bryn🥰
in reply to Joe G • • •David Dunphy
in reply to Joe G • • •