Skip to main content

After months of hard work in my spare time, I'm happy to announce the first beta release of the NVDA Remote Desktop add-on! More details here: nvda-addons.groups.io/g/nvda-a…

nvda-addons@nvda-addons.groups.io | Announcing first beta release of NVDA Remote Desktop

nvda-addons.groups.io

reshared this

Unknown parent

Leonard de Ruijter
Leonard de Ruijter
• •
@glaroc True, but that has a different purpose than this one. NVDA Remote is a standalone solution while this add-on adds support for remote protocols like Microsoft Remote Desktop, Citrix and VMware Horizon.
in reply to Leonard de Ruijter

bgt lover
bgt lover
• •
remote desktop? do you mean something that supports the remote desktop protocol? If not, what's the difference between this and nvda remote?
in reply to bgt lover

Leonard de Ruijter
Leonard de Ruijter
• •
@bgtlover Yes. Data flows over a virtual channel in the remote desktop connection, not a separate channel that requires a server or opening a port like with NVDA Remote.
@bgt lover
in reply to Peter Vágner

Leonard de Ruijter
Leonard de Ruijter
• •
@pvagner @bgtlover Thanks! There was already a paid solution for this, but open source should be fully open source!
@Peter Vágner @bgt lover
in reply to Leonard de Ruijter

bgt lover
bgt lover
• •
@pvagner I did make a windows vm, however the problem is that I don't remember enough windows stuff to get to the point where I start a remote desktop session, I keep reaching for a terminal that's not there.
@Peter Vágner
in reply to bgt lover

Leonard de Ruijter
Leonard de Ruijter
• •
@bgtlover @pvagner You need to enable remote desktop support first. Search for remote in the windows settings (windows+i)
@Peter Vágner @bgt lover
in reply to Leonard de Ruijter

Leonard de Ruijter
Leonard de Ruijter
• •
Really grateful for the help of @twynn who got the add-on working with VMware Horizon, though it needs some polishing due to occational connection dropouts. Nonetheless, this is amazing!
@Timothy Wynn
in reply to Leonard de Ruijter

Timothy Wynn
Timothy Wynn
• •
No, thank you for such a useful add-on. It's too bad their phasing out VDI here pretty soon as they're providing company devices instead.
in reply to Timothy Wynn

Leonard de Ruijter
Leonard de Ruijter
• •
@twynn Well, having a company device is usually better than VDI IMO, especially for blind people who need their screen reading software to work in these environments.
@Timothy Wynn
in reply to Leonard de Ruijter

Timothy Wynn
Timothy Wynn
• •
Oh for sure, and I look forward to it, but it's funny that your add-on started existing at the tail end of my VDI use. It means that stress-testing probably won't happen on my end, though even when I was using VDI, it was just for payroll purposes. Everything else I used external services which are available outside their intranet. Best practices it wasn't, but it definitely kept me more efficient.
⇧