Skip to main content

There is a strong rumour going round that some Fediverse developers and admins have held secret discussions with Meta/Facebook under NDAs.

The Fediverse is supposed to be an alliance of open projects built by a broad grassroots base. Its developers are not supposed to hold secret backroom discussions with people who have a horrific track record (theguardian.com/technology/202…).

Facebook/Meta is in effect a sociopathic corporation (buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanm…). Nothing good will come of talking to them.


Rohingya sue Facebook for £150bn over Myanmar genocide

Victims in US and UK legal action accuse social media firm of failing to prevent incitement of violence
Dan Milmo (The Guardian)
Unknown parent

a Mitten
a Mitten
• •
@Nuno This is exactly what I thought you meant, and I absolutely agree. There are, in fact, sane and non-fanatical people out here as well.
@Arkadiusz Świętnicki 🇨🇳 I HAVE MOVED
Unknown parent

ijatz_La_Hojita
ijatz_La_Hojita
• •

@Nuno @amitten Well, I'd say it depends a lot on the concrete situation. Many #activitypub devs have seen how historically companies like Meta & Google have applied a Trojan horse strategy, to eventually take over the small spaces that decentralized and/or FOSS projects had opened. The #XMPP case comes to mind, but it also encompasses how the whole web has become.

If to put in place measures to avoid that happening to the #Fediverse is being a fanatic, long live the fanatics! 😃

#xmpp #activitypub #fediverse @Arkadiusz Świętnicki 🇨🇳 I HAVE MOVED @a Mitten
⇧