@lernbuddy The encryption would not work... but we might add IMAP support for other providers so that you can store all your emails securely in our desktop clients. ;)
@lernbuddy for some it is ok that encryption is not there, but we gain standard protocols support, many clients and ability to easily migrate *of* #tuta.
Standard protocols do not allow vendor lock-in.
Why not build your protocol on #jmap instead? Like an extension supporting encryption?
Matthias
in reply to Tuta • • •And a question: Will we ever see IMAP with tuta?
Tuta
in reply to Matthias • • •amackif
in reply to Tuta • • •@lernbuddy for some it is ok that encryption is not there, but we gain standard protocols support, many clients and ability to easily migrate *of* #tuta.
Standard protocols do not allow vendor lock-in.
Why not build your protocol on #jmap instead? Like an extension supporting encryption?
CargobikeDad
in reply to Tuta • • •Raccoon von Trasher
in reply to Tuta • • •Tuta
in reply to Raccoon von Trasher • • •Raccoon von Trasher
in reply to Tuta • • •The Mystifying Mad Hatter 🎩
in reply to Tuta • • •alihan_banan
in reply to Tuta • • •Tuta
in reply to alihan_banan • • •Feden
in reply to Tuta • • •JBrickelt963 (φ)
in reply to Tuta • • •h
in reply to Tuta • • •Tuta
in reply to h • • •Miguel Fontoura
in reply to Tuta • • •Tuta
in reply to Miguel Fontoura • • •Miguel Fontoura
in reply to Tuta • • •Tuta
in reply to Miguel Fontoura • • •Miguel Fontoura
in reply to Tuta • • •