10 years ago I wrote about *not* using positive `tabindex` values. Today I added a warning about two Google web-dot-dev articles that a reader thought *promoted* it:
adrianroselli.com/2014/11/dont…
At what point will people recognize that #accessibility info from that site should be ignored?
Filed two issues:
• issuetracker.google.com/issues…
• issuetracker.google.com/issues…
#a11y
Don’t Use Tabindex Greater than 0
Animated GIF Animated GIF showing the tab order on a page using the default Re-CAPTCHA, which sets a tabindex, forcing a keyboard user through six tab-stops to get to the Skip to content link. Tabindex had the potential to be a useful attribute.Adrian Roselli
Seirdy likes this.
reshared this
Freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Unknown parent • • •@Seirdy
at least on MDN you can make an issue to point out wrong info
I had actually done that for their css animations article that used to show examples that would cause constant reflows, they've fixed that now
Large Heydon Collider
in reply to Adrian Roselli • • •DennisL
in reply to Large Heydon Collider • • •