Skip to main content


10 years ago I wrote about *not* using positive `tabindex` values. Today I added a warning about two Google web-dot-dev articles that a reader thought *promoted* it:
adrianroselli.com/2014/11/dont…

At what point will people recognize that #accessibility info from that site should be ignored?

Filed two issues:
issuetracker.google.com/issues…
issuetracker.google.com/issues…

#a11y

reshared this

Unknown parent

@Seirdy
at least on MDN you can make an issue to point out wrong info :neofox_googly_shocked:

I had actually done that for their css animations article that used to show examples that would cause constant reflows, they've fixed that now :blobfoxfloofhappy:

in reply to Adrian Roselli

WTF were they thinking publishing an article called "Modify the DOM Order With tabindex?" 🙄