Skip to main content


Can someone please recommend me a #search #engine that is not
* #Google (Ew google)
* #Duckduckgo (Keeps saying there were no results for my searches despite having the little information box to the right for the exact search)
* #Bing (I'd use bing if it wasn't crammed to death with CoPiLoT)
* #Brave (Ew, brave)
* #Ecosia (Its alright, but its just... slow. And gives kinda crap results)
* #Startpage (I just don't like it)
* #SearxNG (Slow, ugly, and useless)

I will probably update this list as I remember/am reminded about search engines that I've already tried and don't like.

cheers

in reply to Seirdy

I recommend mixing one or two “big” engines for long-tail or quick-answer queries with one or two “small” engines for discovery and surfing of short-tail queries. The long list of Bing-based engines and Mojeek can get you started in the former category; the non-commercial Web section and Stract can help with the latter.
in reply to Seirdy

or you can be like me and rotate between a dozen engines per day :floofTeehee:
in reply to Seirdy

Mojeek rings a bell, I don't think I've ever ventured into using them though. I'll certainly have a play about with these, thanks for the research!
in reply to nex

Fair warning: you can’t use Mojeek the exact same way you use Google, Bing, DDG, etc. Although it’s rolled out some features for semantic search, it shines brightest for simple keyword matches. A more-advanced Control-F for the Web with a ranking algorithm and some word substitutions, like Google once was.

The same is true for most other alternatives in the list.

in reply to Seirdy

I'm quite happy with whatever doesn't give me SEO slop, but still has relevant results, and looks good while doing it :^)
in reply to nex

the problem is that the web is so full of SEO slop that a sufficiently advanced filter will exclude much of the web. that, and building a sufficiently large index is doable but an incredibly difficult multi-year endeavor.
This entry was edited (1 week ago)