@Waxingtonknee Thanks for the feedback! Many end-users requested a version number that has more meaning, ie "year.month", which they find simpler and more meaningful than two arbitrary numbers. Sorry you find it confusing, but we think it's helpful to show users immediately how old (or new!) their version is, with the clear "year.month" scheme.
@Waxingtonknee yes! I personally also agree to it. It is so much better, because the version number also shows a time. There is nothing confusing about it or is it because of American confusing standard date format?
Thomas Rabenstein
in reply to LibreOffice • • •LibreOffice
in reply to Thomas Rabenstein • • •apemantus
in reply to LibreOffice • • •LibreOffice
in reply to apemantus • • •ChristmasWax
in reply to LibreOffice • • •Please go back to proper version numbers.
The new scheme is confusing and makes you look silly
LibreOffice
in reply to ChristmasWax • • •SomeAnoTooter
in reply to LibreOffice • • •