Meta thinks your #privacy is for sale.
Would you pay 160 euros per year to Facebook & Instagram for respecting your right to privacy?
Here's more info: https://tuta.com/blog/meta-pay-for-privacy-illegal
#dataprotection #gdpr #consent #socialmedia #meta #facebook #instgram #whatsapp
Meta Wants You to Pay for Privacy so Poor People Are Deprived of Their Right to Privacy. Is This Even Legal?
Meta's approach of 'pay for your privacy' is wrong in so many ways. Let's find out why!Tutanota
- Yes (4%, 18 votes)
- No (95%, 376 votes)
Kuwuckl
in reply to Tuta • • •Genuine Intelligence
in reply to Tuta • • •Cart
in reply to Tuta • • •Tuta
in reply to Cart • • •Cymphoni Fantastique
in reply to Tuta • • •[People flock to the fediverse, crippling FB and Instagram]
And we all lived happily ever after.
Celinho :catjam:
in reply to Tuta • • •schultzter :mstdnca:
in reply to Tuta • • •dreamingawake09
in reply to Tuta • • •AudraTran :debian:
in reply to Tuta • • •The 160 euros is not to "protect your privacy", it's to remove ads. Meta continues collecting your information, to my knowledge.
Even if they said they wouldn't track you, I wouldn't believe them. Much like I don't trust Google's ad settings.
Zuri (he/him) 🕐 CET
in reply to Tuta • • •dieTasse has moved
in reply to Tuta • • •But second of all, we all say if you do not pay for a product, you are a product. And when they want money to not make people a product we say that we pay for right to privacy. I find this very inconsistent, because in that sense, every paid app is paying for privacy. Without paying they have to get money somewhere right?
But again I must stretch that I would NOT EVER trust facebook, which, for that exact reason, I do not and will not use.
Tuta
Unknown parent • • •Power Of The Negative
in reply to Tuta • • •